KBAvsFLCHETF Comparison
ETF 1
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF
This fund is part of
China Blended Cap
-0.58%
VS
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF (KBA) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. KBA's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, FLCH's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. KBA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.19% for FLCH. KBA is up 3.4% year-to-date (YTD) with -$93M in YTD flows. FLCH performs worse with -11.43% YTD performance, and +$75M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KBA and FLCH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KBA vs FLCH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KBA FLCH | -6.23%-4.00% | -7.80%-2.89% | +3.40%-11.43% | +9.84%-15.38% | +49.05%+30.93% | -0.54%-11.04% |
| Flows | KBA FLCH | -$2M-$8M | -$7M+$57M | -$93M+$75M | -$127M+$123M | -$299M+$191M | -$256M+$217M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KBA FLCH | +22.59%+19.08% | +19.31%+19.53% | +19.17%+23.25% | +19.96%+26.42% |
| Max drawdown | KBA FLCH | -9.73%-7.43% | -9.73%-22.50% | -19.76%-22.50% | -45.85%-49.77% |
| Max drawdown duration | KBA FLCH | 85d29d | 85d349d | 316d349d | 1604d1422d |
Trading data
KBA | FLCH | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.96 | $20.81 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $31.95 | $20.71 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KBA | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KBA | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.96 | $20.81 |
| 1D performance | +0.03% | +0.48% |
| AuM | $138.84 M | $314.58 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
KBA | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | KraneShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | MSCI China A 50 Connect Index | FTSE China RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 893 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 4, 2014 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KBA
China
99.61%
Other
0.39%
FLCH
China
91.37%
Other
8.63%
Sectors
KBA
Technology
29.79%
Finance
18.68%
Industrials
18.27%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.3%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.41%
Other
15.55%
FLCH
Technology
25.27%
Finance
21.73%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
15.64%
Industrials
7.78%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.36%
Other
22.22%
Advertisement
Diversification
KBA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.43%
FLCH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.86%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
KBA
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
9.01%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
6.92%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
5.41%
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd.
4.94%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
3.75%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
3.48%
CMOC Group Ltd.
3.47%
Foxconn Industrial Internet Co., Ltd.
3.20%
BYD Co., Ltd.
3.17%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.97%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.92%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
2.86%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
2.69%
Wanhua Chemical Group Co., Ltd.
2.38%
Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
2.26%
FLCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
12.67%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
9.30%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.64%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.66%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.35%
Xiaomi Corp.
2.27%
Meituan
2.25%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.68%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.66%
NetEase, Inc.
1.59%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.51%
JD.com, Inc.
1.35%
Baidu, Inc.
1.02%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.97%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
0.93%
Frequently asked questions about KBA and FLCH
How have the KBA and FLCH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, KBA is up 3.4% year-to-date (YTD), while FLCH has lost -11.43%. That puts KBA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KBA or FLCH?
Year-to-date, the KBA ETF saw -$93M in flows, compared to +$75M for FLCH.
Which ETF is more volatile: KBA or FLCH?
Over the past year, KBA had a volatility of 19.31%, while FLCH experienced 19.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: KBA or FLCH?
As of September 15, 2026, KBA holds $138.84 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLCH manages $314.58 M.
What sectors do the KBA and FLCH ETFs invest in?
KBA leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, FLCH focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the KBA ETF and FLCH ETF?
KBA top holdings include Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd., Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd. and Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.. FLCH holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: KBA or FLCH?
KBA holds 50 securities with 59.43% of its assets in the top 15. FLCH has 998 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.86%.
Advertisement
Latest news about KBA & FLCH
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KBA
Advertisement
Advertisement
