KATvsRWLETF Comparison
VS
Scharf ETF (KAT) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. KAT's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Finance and Technology. In contrast, RWL's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. KAT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.39% for RWL. KAT is up 2.07% year-to-date (YTD) with -$66M in YTD flows. RWL performs better with 14.57% YTD performance, and +$1.15B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KAT and RWL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KAT vs RWL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KAT RWL | +3.10%+2.66% | -0.35%+7.32% | +2.07%+14.57% | n/a+26.89% | n/a+69.43% | n/a+95.10% |
| Flows | KAT RWL | -$9M-$542M | -$28M+$262M | -$66M+$1.15B | -+$1.98B | -+$4.98B | -+$5.80B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KAT RWL | +9.70%+8.38% | n/a+9.95% | n/a+12.35% | n/a+14.54% |
| Max drawdown | KAT RWL | -4.30%-1.71% | n/a-6.70% | n/a-14.07% | n/a-17.55% |
| Max drawdown duration | KAT RWL | 87d16d | n/a46d | n/a127d | n/a468d |
Trading data
KAT | RWL | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $55.95 | $130.33 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $56.04 | $130.94 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KAT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKAT | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KAT | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $55.95 | $130.33 |
| 1D performance | -0.16% | -0.47% |
| AuM | $668.42 M | $9.52 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
KAT | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Scharf Funds | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index |
| N° of holdings | 105 | 498 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 25, 2025 | February 22, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KAT
USA
73.72%
Other
26.28%
RWL
USA
97.44%
Other
2.56%
Sectors
KAT
Healthcare
20.67%
Finance
17.82%
Technology
16.63%
Industrials
8.55%
Other
36.33%
RWL
Technology
18.36%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
17.56%
Healthcare
17.14%
Finance
15.79%
Industrials
8.37%
Other
22.78%
Advertisement
Diversification
KAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.89%
RWL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.81%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
KAT
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
6.39%
Union Pacific Corp.
5.48%
Markel Group, Inc.
5.04%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.65%
Microsoft Corp.
4.57%
McKesson Corp.
4.05%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.01%
Chubb Ltd.
3.95%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
3.32%
Otis Worldwide Corp.
3.29%
Franco-Nevada Corp.
3.09%
Adobe, Inc.
3.07%
Centene Corp.
3.02%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
2.99%
Visa, Inc.
2.97%
RWL
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.54%
Walmart, Inc.
3.38%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2.95%
Apple, Inc.
2.57%
CVS Health Corp.
2.43%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.77%
McKesson Corp.
1.59%
Microsoft Corp.
1.58%
Centene Corp.
1.57%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
1.54%
The Cigna Group
1.47%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.42%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.41%
Elevance Health, Inc.
1.33%
Ford Motor Co.
1.27%
Frequently asked questions about KAT and RWL
How have the KAT and RWL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, KAT is up 2.07% year-to-date (YTD), while RWL has returned 14.57%. That puts RWL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KAT or RWL?
Year-to-date, the KAT ETF saw -$66M in flows, compared to +$1.15B for RWL.
Which ETF is bigger: KAT or RWL?
As of July 17, 2026, KAT holds $668.42 M in assets under management (AUM), while RWL manages $9.52 B.
What sectors do the KAT and RWL ETFs invest in?
KAT leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Finance and Technology. Meanwhile, RWL focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the KAT ETF and RWL ETF?
KAT top holdings include Occidental Petroleum Corp., Union Pacific Corp. and Markel Group, Inc.. RWL holds in its top three: Amazon.com, Inc., Walmart, Inc. and UnitedHealth Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: KAT or RWL?
KAT holds 109 securities with 59.89% of its assets in the top 15. RWL has 501 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.81%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
