Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JUSAvsBBUSETF Comparison
JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF (JUSA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. JUSA's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. In contrast, BBUS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. JUSA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.02% for BBUS. JUSA is down -0.78% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. BBUS performs worse with -1.03% YTD performance, and +$468M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JUSA and BBUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JUSA vs BBUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JUSA BBUS | -2.46%-2.21% | -1.43%-1.63% | -0.78%-1.03% | +20.69%+22.04% | n/a+83.23% | n/a+82.44% |
| Flows | JUSA BBUS | -+$62M | +$6M+$616M | +$5M+$468M | +$28M+$2.11B | -+$4.08B | -+$5.08B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JUSA BBUS | +11.25%+11.61% | +18.19%+18.33% | n/a+14.94% | n/a+17.10% |
| Max drawdown | JUSA BBUS | -3.33%-3.50% | -13.90%-13.90% | n/a-19.04% | n/a-25.46% |
| Max drawdown duration | JUSA BBUS | 29d42d | 45d45d | n/a126d | n/a715d |
JUSA | BBUS | |
Last sale 3/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.14 | $121.91 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $61.29 | $122.02 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JUSA | BBUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JUSA | BBUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.14 | $121.91 |
| 1D performance | -0.24% | -0.09% |
| AuM | $32.12 M | $7.16 B |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.02% |
JUSA | BBUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index |
| N° of holdings | 222 | 461 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 13, 2025 | March 12, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JUSA and BBUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, JUSA is down -0.78% year-to-date (YTD), while BBUS has lost -1.03%. That puts JUSA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JUSA or BBUS?
Year-to-date, the JUSA ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$468M for BBUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: JUSA or BBUS?
Over the past year, JUSA had a volatility of 18.19%, while BBUS experienced 18.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: JUSA or BBUS?
As of March 10, 2026, JUSA holds $32.12 M in assets under management (AUM), while BBUS manages $7.16 B.
What sectors do the JUSA and BBUS ETFs invest in?
JUSA leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, BBUS focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the JUSA ETF and BBUS ETF?
JUSA top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. BBUS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: JUSA or BBUS?
JUSA holds 232 securities with 45.84% of its assets in the top 15. BBUS has 491 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.79%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
