Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JSMLvsVTWGETF Comparison
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. JSML is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.06% for VTWG. JSML is down -1.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$28M in YTD flows. VTWG performs better with 0.56% YTD performance, and +$68M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JSML and VTWG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JSML vs VTWG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JSML VTWG | -6.13%-4.77% | -3.35%-2.56% | -1.73%+0.56% | +21.44%+27.24% | +47.50%+51.81% | +11.39%+9.89% |
| Flows | JSML VTWG | +$2M-$400K | +$33M+$114M | +$28M+$68M | -$4M+$80M | +$147M+$202M | +$142M+$342M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JSML VTWG | +19.59%+20.99% | +23.34%+24.94% | +21.54%+22.04% | +23.96%+24.72% |
| Max drawdown | JSML VTWG | -9.72%-9.45% | -12.69%-17.20% | -25.88%-28.47% | -37.88%-40.46% |
| Max drawdown duration | JSML VTWG | 46d47d | 44d46d | 287d280d | 1160d1409d |
JSML | VTWG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $72.10 | $237.06 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $72.20 | $237.17 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JSML | VTWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JSML | VTWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $72.10 | $237.06 |
| 1D performance | -0.14% | -0.05% |
| AuM | $278.57 M | $1.22 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.06% |
JSML | VTWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Janus Henderson Investors | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 2000 Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 108 | 914 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 23, 2016 | September 20, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JSML and VTWG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, JSML is down -1.73% year-to-date (YTD), while VTWG has returned 0.56%. That puts VTWG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JSML or VTWG?
Year-to-date, the JSML ETF saw +$28M in flows, compared to +$68M for VTWG.
Which ETF is more volatile: JSML or VTWG?
Over the past year, JSML had a volatility of 23.34%, while VTWG experienced 24.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: JSML or VTWG?
As of March 9, 2026, JSML holds $278.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while VTWG manages $1.22 B.
What sectors do the JSML and VTWG ETFs invest in?
JSML leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, VTWG focuses on Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the JSML ETF and VTWG ETF?
JSML top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, ENOVA INTERNATIONAL and CACTUS INC. VTWG holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET.
Which ETF is more diversified: JSML or VTWG?
JSML holds 110 securities with 26.24% of its assets in the top 15. VTWG has 1112 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.39%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
