Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JSMLvsRZGETF Comparison
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap Growth. JSML's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, RZG's top sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. JSML is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.35% for RZG. JSML is down -1.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$28M in YTD flows. RZG performs better with 5.46% YTD performance, and -$35K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JSML and RZG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JSML vs RZG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JSML RZG | -6.13%-3.25% | -3.35%+2.95% | -1.73%+5.46% | +21.44%+25.38% | +47.50%+52.63% | +11.39%+12.26% |
| Flows | JSML RZG | +$2M-$584K | +$33M-$1M | +$28M-$35K | -$4M-$13M | +$147M-$18M | +$142M-$39M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JSML RZG | +19.59%+17.06% | +23.34%+22.31% | +21.54%+20.34% | +23.96%+22.97% |
| Max drawdown | JSML RZG | -9.72%-5.58% | -12.69%-14.71% | -25.88%-25.62% | -37.88%-38.45% |
| Max drawdown duration | JSML RZG | 46d12d | 44d46d | 287d296d | 1160d1521d |
JSML | RZG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $72.10 | $57.04 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $72.20 | $57.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JSML | RZG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JSML | RZG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $72.10 | $57.04 |
| 1D performance | -0.14% | -0.49% |
| AuM | $278.57 M | $108.91 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.35% |
JSML | RZG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Janus Henderson Investors | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 108 | 120 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 23, 2016 | March 1, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JSML and RZG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, JSML is down -1.73% year-to-date (YTD), while RZG has returned 5.46%. That puts RZG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JSML or RZG?
Year-to-date, the JSML ETF saw +$28M in flows, compared to -$35K for RZG.
Which ETF is more volatile: JSML or RZG?
Over the past year, JSML had a volatility of 23.34%, while RZG experienced 22.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: JSML or RZG?
As of March 9, 2026, JSML holds $278.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while RZG manages $108.91 M.
What sectors do the JSML and RZG ETFs invest in?
JSML leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, RZG focuses on Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the JSML ETF and RZG ETF?
JSML top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, ENOVA INTERNATIONAL and CACTUS INC. RZG holds in its top three: ACM RESEARCH, PTC THERAPEUTI/D and TRANSMEDICS GROUP.
Which ETF is more diversified: JSML or RZG?
JSML holds 110 securities with 26.24% of its assets in the top 15. RZG has 130 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.07%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
