Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JSMLvsCAFGETF Comparison
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) belongs to the US Small Cap Growth segment. Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. JSML's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, CAFG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials. JSML is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.59% for CAFG. JSML is down -1.88% year-to-date (YTD) with +$28M in YTD flows. CAFG performs better with 4.69% YTD performance, and +$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JSML and CAFG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JSML vs CAFG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JSML CAFG | -5.79%-5.01% | -5.84%+2.78% | -1.88%+4.69% | +21.67%+17.04% | +54.46%n/a | +7.33%n/a |
| Flows | JSML CAFG | +$2M- | +$28M+$1M | +$28M+$1M | -$4M-$2M | +$147M- | +$139M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JSML CAFG | +19.21%+18.50% | +23.29%+20.93% | +21.43%n/a | +23.94%n/a |
| Max drawdown | JSML CAFG | -9.72%-6.32% | -12.69%-12.84% | -25.88%n/a | -37.88%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | JSML CAFG | 48d15d | 44d37d | 287dn/a | 1160dn/a |
JSML | CAFG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $70.21 | $26.55 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $70.12 | $26.52 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JSML | CAFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JSML | CAFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $70.21 | $26.55 |
| 1D performance | +0.13% | +0.12% |
| AuM | $278.16 M | $19.25 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.59% |
JSML | CAFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Janus Henderson Investors | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 108 | 97 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 23, 2016 | May 1, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JSML and CAFG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, JSML is down -1.88% year-to-date (YTD), while CAFG has returned 4.69%. That puts CAFG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JSML or CAFG?
Year-to-date, the JSML ETF saw +$28M in flows, compared to +$1M for CAFG.
Which ETF is more volatile: JSML or CAFG?
Over the past year, JSML had a volatility of 23.29%, while CAFG experienced 20.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: JSML or CAFG?
As of March 11, 2026, JSML holds $278.16 M in assets under management (AUM), while CAFG manages $19.25 M.
What sectors do the JSML and CAFG ETFs invest in?
JSML leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, CAFG focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the JSML ETF and CAFG ETF?
JSML top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, ENOVA INTERNATIONAL and CACTUS INC. CAFG holds in its top three: VICOR, POWELL INDUSTRIES and SEMTECH.
Which ETF is more diversified: JSML or CAFG?
JSML holds 110 securities with 26.24% of its assets in the top 15. CAFG has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.65%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
