Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JSMDvsFNYETF Comparison
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund ETF (FNY) is part of the US Mid Cap Growth segment. JSMD's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials. In contrast, FNY's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. JSMD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.73% for FNY. JSMD is down -1.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$97M in YTD flows. FNY performs better with -0.47% YTD performance, and +$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JSMD and FNY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JSMD vs FNY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JSMD FNY | -6.93%-4.55% | -5.91%-2.53% | -1.03%-0.47% | +16.60%+23.12% | +53.24%+60.65% | +22.56%+32.13% |
| Flows | JSMD FNY | +$48M-$5M | +$103M+$15M | +$97M+$15M | +$356M+$18M | +$533M+$91M | +$582M-$99M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JSMD FNY | +20.85%+19.88% | +23.18%+23.49% | +19.99%+20.24% | +21.83%+22.44% |
| Max drawdown | JSMD FNY | -10.07%-8.32% | -13.67%-14.88% | -24.31%-24.97% | -30.97%-33.90% |
| Max drawdown duration | JSMD FNY | 48d49d | 44d46d | 256d275d | 862d1045d |
JSMD | FNY | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $77.94 | $90.36 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $78.20 | $90.70 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JSMD | FNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JSMD | FNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $77.94 | $90.36 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | -0.37% |
| AuM | $838.64 M | $471.61 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.73% |
JSMD | FNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Janus Henderson Investors | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 109 | 206 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 23, 2016 | April 19, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JSMD and FNY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, JSMD is down -1.03% year-to-date (YTD), while FNY has lost -0.47%. That puts FNY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JSMD or FNY?
Year-to-date, the JSMD ETF saw +$97M in flows, compared to +$15M for FNY.
Which ETF is more volatile: JSMD or FNY?
Over the past year, JSMD had a volatility of 23.18%, while FNY experienced 23.49%.
Which ETF is bigger: JSMD or FNY?
As of March 11, 2026, JSMD holds $838.64 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNY manages $471.61 M.
What sectors do the JSMD and FNY ETFs invest in?
JSMD leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials. Meanwhile, FNY focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the JSMD ETF and FNY ETF?
JSMD top holdings include COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and TEMPUR PEDIC INTERNATIONAL. FNY holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, AST SPACEMOBILE and TTM TECHNOLOGIES.
Which ETF is more diversified: JSMD or FNY?
JSMD holds 109 securities with 25.37% of its assets in the top 15. FNY has 224 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.29%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
