JPANvsFLJHETF Comparison
VS
Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. JPAN's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, FLJH's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. JPAN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.09% for FLJH. JPAN is up 15.11% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. FLJH performs better with 22.27% YTD performance, and +$47M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JPAN and FLJH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
JPAN vs FLJH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JPAN FLJH | -1.47%+1.06% | +5.42%+8.85% | +15.11%+22.27% | +26.97%+46.38% | n/a+112.73% | n/a+175.70% |
| Flows | JPAN FLJH | +$2M+$9M | +$2M+$27M | +$3M+$47M | +$3M+$54M | --$106M | -+$107M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JPAN FLJH | +22.95%+21.48% | +22.59%+20.39% | n/a+21.45% | n/a+19.41% |
| Max drawdown | JPAN FLJH | -7.17%-5.44% | -14.82%-11.13% | n/a-25.01% | n/a-25.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | JPAN FLJH | 35d34d | 85d71d | n/a321d | n/a321d |
Trading data
JPAN | FLJH | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.02 | $44.36 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $40.94 | $45.16 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
JPAN
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexJPAN | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
JPAN | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.02 | $44.36 |
| 1D performance | -2.25% | -1.77% |
| AuM | $9.87 M | $182.00 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
JPAN | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Matthews Asia | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 51 | 474 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2023 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
JPAN
Japan
97.57%
Other
2.43%
FLJH
Japan
100%
Other
0%
Sectors
JPAN
Technology
28.54%
Industrials
23.08%
Finance
20.94%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.33%
Other
18.11%
FLJH
Technology
24.81%
Finance
19.28%
Industrials
18.39%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.92%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.01%
Other
19.6%
Advertisement
Diversification
JPAN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.06%
FLJH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.49%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
JPAN
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
6.19%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
4.67%
Advantest Corp.
3.79%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
3.36%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
3.29%
Sony Group Corp.
3.04%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.98%
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
2.90%
Panasonic Holdings Corp.
2.86%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
2.77%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
2.56%
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
2.51%
ORIX Corp.
2.51%
KEYENCE Corp.
2.50%
Sumitomo Corp.
2.11%
FLJH
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
3.57%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
3.24%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
3.12%
Toyota Motor Corp.
2.97%
Advantest Corp.
2.36%
SoftBank Group Corp.
2.36%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.33%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.99%
Sony Group Corp.
1.91%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.89%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.85%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.54%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.50%
KEYENCE Corp.
1.46%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.41%
Frequently asked questions about JPAN and FLJH
How have the JPAN and FLJH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, JPAN is up 15.11% year-to-date (YTD), while FLJH has returned 22.27%. That puts FLJH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JPAN or FLJH?
Year-to-date, the JPAN ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$47M for FLJH.
Which ETF is more volatile: JPAN or FLJH?
Over the past year, JPAN had a volatility of 22.59%, while FLJH experienced 20.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: JPAN or FLJH?
As of July 27, 2026, JPAN holds $9.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLJH manages $182.00 M.
What sectors do the JPAN and FLJH ETFs invest in?
JPAN leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, FLJH focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the JPAN ETF and FLJH ETF?
JPAN top holdings include Tokyo Electron Ltd., Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. and Advantest Corp.. FLJH holds in its top three: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Tokyo Electron Ltd. and Kioxia Holdings Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: JPAN or FLJH?
JPAN holds 51 securities with 48.06% of its assets in the top 15. FLJH has 474 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.49%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
