Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JMOMvsGSLCETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
JPMorgan US Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. JMOM's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, GSLC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. JMOM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.09% for GSLC. JMOM is up 2.68% year-to-date (YTD) with +$158M in YTD flows. GSLC performs worse with -1.64% YTD performance, and -$289M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JMOM and GSLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JMOM vs GSLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JMOM GSLC | -1.52%-2.50% | +0.72%-2.11% | +2.68%-1.64% | +26.87%+19.29% | +91.71%+75.76% | +87.21%+79.19% |
| Flows | JMOM GSLC | +$21M+$33M | +$175M-$214M | +$158M-$289M | +$336M-$242M | +$1.19B-$2.25B | +$1.28B-$3.72B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JMOM GSLC | +14.96%+11.53% | +19.32%+18.03% | +16.01%+14.62% | +18.48%+16.64% |
| Max drawdown | JMOM GSLC | -3.55%-3.81% | -13.62%-13.56% | -19.32%-18.65% | -28.26%-24.87% |
| Max drawdown duration | JMOM GSLC | 25d57d | 37d45d | 125d126d | 804d713d |
JMOM | GSLC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 6:27 PM | $69.09 | $128.28 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $69.96 | $129.93 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JMOM | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JMOM | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $69.09 | $128.28 |
| 1D performance | -1.24% | -1.27% |
| AuM | $1.96 B | $14.48 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.09% |
JMOM | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 248 | 405 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 9, 2017 | September 17, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JMOM and GSLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, JMOM is up 2.68% year-to-date (YTD), while GSLC has lost -1.64%. That puts JMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JMOM or GSLC?
Year-to-date, the JMOM ETF saw +$158M in flows, compared to -$289M for GSLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: JMOM or GSLC?
Over the past year, JMOM had a volatility of 19.32%, while GSLC experienced 18.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: JMOM or GSLC?
As of March 11, 2026, JMOM holds $1.96 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSLC manages $14.48 B.
What sectors do the JMOM and GSLC ETFs invest in?
JMOM leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, GSLC focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the JMOM ETF and GSLC ETF?
JMOM top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, NVIDIA and META PLATFORMS. GSLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: JMOM or GSLC?
JMOM holds 267 securities with 23.68% of its assets in the top 15. GSLC has 432 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.3%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
