Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JMOMvsCVLCETF Comparison
JPMorgan US Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) is part of the US Large Cap segment. JMOM's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, CVLC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. JMOM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.15% for CVLC. JMOM is up 0.95% year-to-date (YTD) with +$153M in YTD flows. CVLC performs worse with -1.51% YTD performance, and +$30M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JMOM and CVLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JMOM vs CVLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JMOM CVLC | -1.66%-2.99% | +0.68%-2.58% | +0.95%-1.51% | +23.78%+21.81% | +88.48%+78.82% | +84.58%n/a |
| Flows | JMOM CVLC | +$12M+$17M | +$164M+$55M | +$153M+$30M | +$328M+$209M | +$1.18B+$491M | +$1.28B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JMOM CVLC | +14.98%+12.18% | +19.39%+18.46% | +16.04%+15.37% | +18.50%n/a |
| Max drawdown | JMOM CVLC | -3.72%-4.15% | -13.62%-13.99% | -19.32%-19.88% | -28.26%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | JMOM CVLC | 10d58d | 37d45d | 125d155d | 804dn/a |
JMOM | CVLC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 6:16 PM | $68.75 | $81.42 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $68.79 | $81.56 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JMOM | CVLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JMOM | CVLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.75 | $81.42 |
| 1D performance | -0.06% | -0.17% |
| AuM | $1.92 B | $709.22 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.15% |
JMOM | CVLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Morgan Stanley |
| Benchmark | JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index | Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index |
| N° of holdings | 248 | 722 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 9, 2017 | February 1, 2023 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JMOM and CVLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, JMOM is up 0.95% year-to-date (YTD), while CVLC has lost -1.51%. That puts JMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JMOM or CVLC?
Year-to-date, the JMOM ETF saw +$153M in flows, compared to +$30M for CVLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: JMOM or CVLC?
Over the past year, JMOM had a volatility of 19.39%, while CVLC experienced 18.46%.
Which ETF is bigger: JMOM or CVLC?
As of March 12, 2026, JMOM holds $1.92 B in assets under management (AUM), while CVLC manages $709.22 M.
What sectors do the JMOM and CVLC ETFs invest in?
JMOM leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, CVLC focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the JMOM ETF and CVLC ETF?
JMOM top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, NVIDIA and META PLATFORMS. CVLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: JMOM or CVLC?
JMOM holds 267 securities with 23.68% of its assets in the top 15. CVLC has 740 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.24%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
