Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JMIDvsIWPETF Comparison
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap Growth. JMID's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Industrials. In contrast, IWP's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Industrials. JMID is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.23% for IWP. JMID is down -0.42% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. IWP performs worse with -5.27% YTD performance, and -$248M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JMID and IWP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JMID vs IWP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JMID IWP | -3.42%-3.46% | -3.14%-6.15% | -0.42%-5.27% | +14.73%+13.27% | n/a+52.28% | n/a+27.59% |
| Flows | JMID IWP | +$756K+$266M | -$2M+$56M | -$3M-$248M | -$4M+$1.42B | -+$2.13B | -+$781M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JMID IWP | +16.69%+18.14% | +22.74%+23.41% | n/a+19.23% | n/a+22.37% |
| Max drawdown | JMID IWP | -5.08%-8.63% | -16.29%-16.33% | n/a-25.34% | n/a-38.70% |
| Max drawdown duration | JMID IWP | 55d66d | 46d38d | n/a134d | n/a1059d |
JMID | IWP | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.17 | $129.63 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $28.28 | $129.88 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JMID | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JMID | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.17 | $129.63 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $17.36 M | $19.21 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.23% |
JMID | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Janus Henderson Investors | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell Midcap Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 82 | 245 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 17, 2024 | July 17, 2001 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JMID and IWP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, JMID is down -0.42% year-to-date (YTD), while IWP has lost -5.27%. That puts JMID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JMID or IWP?
Year-to-date, the JMID ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to -$248M for IWP.
Which ETF is more volatile: JMID or IWP?
Over the past year, JMID had a volatility of 22.74%, while IWP experienced 23.41%.
Which ETF is bigger: JMID or IWP?
As of March 11, 2026, JMID holds $17.36 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWP manages $19.21 B.
What sectors do the JMID and IWP ETFs invest in?
JMID leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWP focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the JMID ETF and IWP ETF?
JMID top holdings include AMERISOURCEBERGEN, VERTIV HOLDINGS and AMERIPRISE FINANCE. IWP holds in its top three: ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP, HOWMET AEROSPACE INC and VERTIV HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: JMID or IWP?
JMID holds 83 securities with 37.53% of its assets in the top 15. IWP has 281 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.64%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
