JLQDvsSCHZETF Comparison
VS
Janus Henderson Sustainable Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) belongs to the Intl IG Bonds segment. Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) is part of the US Aggregate Bonds segment. JLQD's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, SCHZ's top sector exposures are Sovereign, Industrials and Government Agencies. JLQD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.03% for SCHZ. JLQD is down -2.27% year-to-date (YTD) with -$8M in YTD flows. SCHZ performs better with -1.51% YTD performance, and +$1.65B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JLQD and SCHZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
JLQD vs SCHZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JLQD SCHZ | -0.72%-0.04% | -2.46%-1.72% | -2.27%-1.51% | -2.31%-1.68% | +19.52%+14.88% | -2.45%-1.84% |
| Flows | JLQD SCHZ | -+$124M | +$2M+$397M | -$8M+$1.65B | -$8M+$2.09B | -$14M+$3.92B | -$26M+$3.11B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JLQD SCHZ | +4.31%+4.37% | +3.97%+3.85% | +5.39%+4.97% | +6.54%+5.98% |
| Max drawdown | JLQD SCHZ | -3.67%-3.29% | -4.72%-4.68% | -4.72%-4.88% | -22.58%-17.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | JLQD SCHZ | 89d52d | 229d229d | 229d284d | 1802d1556d |
Trading data
JLQD | SCHZ | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.26 | $22.29 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $39.25 | $22.28 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
JLQD
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexJLQD | SCHZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
JLQD | SCHZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.26 | $22.29 |
| 1D performance | +0.01% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $15.73 M | $10.67 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
JLQD | SCHZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Janus Henderson Investors | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index |
| N° of holdings | 136 | 577 |
| Asset class | - | Bonds |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 9, 2021 | July 14, 2011 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
JLQD
USA
77.5%
Other
22.5%
SCHZ
USA
83.82%
Other
16.18%
Sectors
JLQD
Finance
34.88%
Industrials
8.24%
Energy
8.09%
Healthcare
7.34%
Other
41.45%
SCHZ
Sovereign
72.98%
Industrials
10.09%
Other
16.93%
Advertisement
Diversification
JLQD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.1%
SCHZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.98%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
JLQD
Foundry JV Holdco, 6.2% 25jan2037, USD
1.76%
Regency Centers, L.P., 4.5% 15mar2033, USD
1.76%
US47103U7384
1.75%
Ford Motor, 6.1% 19aug2032, USD
1.74%
Lowe's, 3.65% 5apr2029, USD
1.55%
American Airlines 2026-1, 5.75% 10may2035, USD (ABS, B)
1.55%
Atlas Warehouse Lending, 5.25% 15jan2033, USD
1.53%
MARS, 5.2% 1mar2035, USD
1.50%
US47103U8523
1.45%
Marex Group, 5.68% 21apr2031, USD
1.27%
Enbridge, 5.55% 20jun2035, USD
1.26%
JBS USA Finance, 3.625% 15jan2032, USD
1.26%
SK Hynix, 4.25% 11sep2028, USD
1.25%
US05971KBA60
1.24%
Antero Resources, 5.4% 1feb2036, USD
1.23%
SCHZ
USA, Notes 4.375% 15may2036, USD (C-2036)
0.73%
USA, Notes 4.125% 15feb2036, USD (B-2036)
0.64%
USA, Notes 4.625% 15feb2035, USD (B-2035)
0.63%
USA, Notes 4.375% 15may2034, USD (C-2034)
0.62%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15nov2034, USD (F-2034)
0.62%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15may2035, USD (C-2035)
0.61%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15aug2035, USD (E-2035)
0.61%
USA, Notes 4% 15feb2034, USD (B-2034)
0.61%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2034, USD (E-2034)
0.60%
USA, Notes 4% 15nov2035, USD (F-2035)
0.60%
USA, Notes 4.5% 15nov2033, USD (F-2033)
0.59%
USA, Notes 3.5% 31jan2028, USD (U-2028)
0.55%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2033, USD (E-2033)
0.54%
USA, Notes 4% 28feb2030, USD (H-2030)
0.51%
USA, Notes 1.25% 15aug2031, USD (E-2031)
0.51%
Frequently asked questions about JLQD and SCHZ
How have the JLQD and SCHZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, JLQD is down -2.27% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHZ has lost -1.51%. That puts SCHZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JLQD or SCHZ?
Year-to-date, the JLQD ETF saw -$8M in flows, compared to +$1.65B for SCHZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: JLQD or SCHZ?
Over the past year, JLQD had a volatility of 3.97%, while SCHZ experienced 3.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: JLQD or SCHZ?
As of October 16, 2026, JLQD holds $15.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHZ manages $10.67 B.
What sectors do the JLQD and SCHZ ETFs invest in?
JLQD leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, SCHZ focuses on Sovereign and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the JLQD ETF and SCHZ ETF?
JLQD top holdings include Foundry JV Holdco, 6.2% 25jan2037, USD, Regency Centers, L.P., 4.5% 15mar2033, USD and US47103U7384. SCHZ holds in its top three: USA, Notes 4.375% 15may2036, USD (C-2036), USA, Notes 4.125% 15feb2036, USD (B-2036) and USA, Notes 4.625% 15feb2035, USD (B-2035).
Which ETF is more diversified: JLQD or SCHZ?
JLQD holds 147 securities with 22.1% of its assets in the top 15. SCHZ has 1446 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.98%.
Advertisement
Latest news about JLQD & SCHZ
Advertisement
