JLQDvsICVTETF Comparison
VS
Janus Henderson Sustainable Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) belongs to the Intl IG Bonds segment. iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) is part of the Convertible Bonds segment. JLQD's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, ICVT's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. JLQD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.2% for ICVT. JLQD is down -2.27% year-to-date (YTD) with -$8M in YTD flows. ICVT performs better with 8.05% YTD performance, and +$3.56B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JLQD and ICVT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
JLQD vs ICVT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JLQD ICVT | -0.72%-5.95% | -2.46%-7.16% | -2.27%+8.05% | -2.31%+4.35% | +19.52%+51.94% | -2.45%+20.33% |
| Flows | JLQD ICVT | -+$391M | +$2M+$1.01B | -$8M+$3.56B | -$8M+$4.54B | -$14M+$5.55B | -$26M+$5.59B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JLQD ICVT | +4.31%+17.85% | +3.97%+17.93% | +5.39%+12.80% | +6.54%+12.91% |
| Max drawdown | JLQD ICVT | -3.67%-11.43% | -4.72%-15.01% | -4.72%-15.01% | -22.58%-29.37% |
| Max drawdown duration | JLQD ICVT | 89d60d | 229d117d | 229d117d | 1802d1339d |
Trading data
JLQD | ICVT | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.26 | $105.08 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $39.25 | $107.46 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
JLQD
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexJLQD | ICVT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
JLQD | ICVT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.26 | $105.08 |
| 1D performance | +0.01% | -2.21% |
| AuM | $15.73 M | $7.60 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
JLQD | ICVT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Janus Henderson Investors | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond Index |
| N° of holdings | 136 | 355 |
| Asset class | - | Bonds |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 9, 2021 | June 2, 2015 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
JLQD
USA
77.5%
Other
22.5%
ICVT
USA
79.83%
Other
20.17%
Sectors
JLQD
Finance
34.88%
Industrials
8.24%
Energy
8.09%
Healthcare
7.34%
Other
41.45%
ICVT
Technology
33.95%
Finance
11.11%
Healthcare
10.54%
Industrials
7.83%
Utilities
7.5%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.33%
Other
21.74%
Advertisement
Diversification
JLQD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.1%
ICVT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.48%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
JLQD
Foundry JV Holdco, 6.2% 25jan2037, USD
1.76%
Regency Centers, L.P., 4.5% 15mar2033, USD
1.76%
US47103U7384
1.75%
Ford Motor, 6.1% 19aug2032, USD
1.74%
Lowe's, 3.65% 5apr2029, USD
1.55%
American Airlines 2026-1, 5.75% 10may2035, USD (ABS, B)
1.55%
Atlas Warehouse Lending, 5.25% 15jan2033, USD
1.53%
MARS, 5.2% 1mar2035, USD
1.50%
US47103U8523
1.45%
Marex Group, 5.68% 21apr2031, USD
1.27%
Enbridge, 5.55% 20jun2035, USD
1.26%
JBS USA Finance, 3.625% 15jan2032, USD
1.26%
SK Hynix, 4.25% 11sep2028, USD
1.25%
US05971KBA60
1.24%
Antero Resources, 5.4% 1feb2036, USD
1.23%
ICVT
Western Digital, 3% 15nov2028, USD (Conv.)
1.89%
Alibaba, 0.5% 1jun2031, USD (Conv.)
1.85%
Lumentum Holdings, 0.375% 15mar2032, USD (Conv.)
1.76%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
1.64%
CoreWeave, 1.75% 1oct2032, USD (Conv.)
1.05%
Nebius, 1.25% 15mar2031, USD (Conv.)
0.98%
Bloom Energy, 0% 15nov2030, USD (Conv.)
0.97%
US63954QAN60
0.96%
Cloudflare, 0% 15jun2030, USD (Conv.)
0.84%
DoorDash, 0% 15may2030, USD (Conv.)
0.82%
Nebius, 1% 15sep2030, USD (Conv.)
0.76%
Ciena, 0% 15sep2031, USD (Conv.)
0.76%
CoreWeave, 1.75% 1dec2031, USD (Conv.)
0.75%
GameStop, 0% 15jun2032, USD (Conv.)
0.73%
Snowflake, 0% 1oct2029, USD (Conv.)
0.71%
Frequently asked questions about JLQD and ICVT
How have the JLQD and ICVT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, JLQD is down -2.27% year-to-date (YTD), while ICVT has returned 8.05%. That puts ICVT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JLQD or ICVT?
Year-to-date, the JLQD ETF saw -$8M in flows, compared to +$3.56B for ICVT.
Which ETF is more volatile: JLQD or ICVT?
Over the past year, JLQD had a volatility of 3.97%, while ICVT experienced 17.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: JLQD or ICVT?
As of October 16, 2026, JLQD holds $15.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while ICVT manages $7.60 B.
What sectors do the JLQD and ICVT ETFs invest in?
JLQD leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, ICVT focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the JLQD ETF and ICVT ETF?
JLQD top holdings include Foundry JV Holdco, 6.2% 25jan2037, USD, Regency Centers, L.P., 4.5% 15mar2033, USD and US47103U7384. ICVT holds in its top three: Western Digital, 3% 15nov2028, USD (Conv.), Alibaba, 0.5% 1jun2031, USD (Conv.) and Lumentum Holdings, 0.375% 15mar2032, USD (Conv.).
Which ETF is more diversified: JLQD or ICVT?
JLQD holds 147 securities with 22.1% of its assets in the top 15. ICVT has 384 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.48%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
