JHSCvsQVMSETF Comparison
VS
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Industrials and Technology. JHSC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.46%, versus 0.15% for QVMS. JHSC is up 15.84% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. QVMS performs better with 21.94% YTD performance, and -$662K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JHSC and QVMS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
JHSC vs QVMS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JHSC QVMS | -0.43%-1.72% | +4.63%+6.50% | +15.84%+21.94% | +22.42%+33.41% | +42.51%+47.22% | +46.59%+50.91% |
| Flows | JHSC QVMS | +$41M+$346K | -$2M+$45K | -$10M-$662K | +$48M-$801K | +$162M-$34M | +$103M+$109M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JHSC QVMS | +13.21%+15.84% | +16.04%+17.38% | +18.75%+20.13% | +20.08%+20.96% |
| Max drawdown | JHSC QVMS | -3.69%-4.06% | -9.51%-8.69% | -25.36%-27.75% | -25.36%-27.75% |
| Max drawdown duration | JHSC QVMS | 16d16d | 53d59d | 379d380d | 379d380d |
Trading data
JHSC | QVMS | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 7:59 PM | $48.23 | $34.21 |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $48.34 | $34.23 |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
JHSC | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
JHSC | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.23 | $34.21 |
| 1D performance | -0.23% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $727.93 M | $250.60 M |
| E/R | 0.46% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
JHSC | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | John Hancock Investments | Invesco |
| Benchmark | John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 482 | 539 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 11, 2017 | June 30, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
JHSC
USA
96.52%
Other
3.48%
QVMS
USA
97.55%
Other
2.45%
Sectors
JHSC
Finance
26.11%
Industrials
14.02%
Technology
11.38%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.06%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.8%
Healthcare
8.44%
Other
22.19%
QVMS
Finance
25.4%
Industrials
13.86%
Technology
13.29%
Healthcare
11.67%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.69%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.19%
Other
19.89%
Advertisement
Diversification
JHSC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.76%
QVMS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
JHSC
Littelfuse, Inc.
0.63%
Arrow Electronics, Inc.
0.63%
Element Solutions, Inc.
0.61%
Sanmina Corp.
0.55%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.54%
Ryder System, Inc.
0.53%
AAON, Inc.
0.53%
The Timken Co.
0.51%
Semtech Corp.
0.51%
Hut 8 Corp.
0.47%
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
0.45%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.45%
Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana)
0.45%
Avnet, Inc.
0.44%
Commercial Metals Co.
0.44%
QVMS
Argan, Inc.
0.73%
Element Solutions, Inc.
0.68%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.67%
FormFactor, Inc.
0.67%
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
0.63%
MaxLinear, Inc.
0.62%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.58%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.57%
Alkermes Plc
0.53%
Qorvo, Inc.
0.53%
StoneX Group, Inc.
0.53%
Everus Construction Group, Inc.
0.53%
Powell Industries, Inc.
0.53%
Eastman Chemical Co.
0.52%
MYR Group, Inc.
0.52%
Frequently asked questions about JHSC and QVMS
How have the JHSC and QVMS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, JHSC is up 15.84% year-to-date (YTD), while QVMS has returned 21.94%. That puts QVMS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JHSC or QVMS?
Year-to-date, the JHSC ETF saw -$10M in flows, compared to -$662K for QVMS.
Which ETF is more volatile: JHSC or QVMS?
Over the past year, JHSC had a volatility of 16.04%, while QVMS experienced 17.38%.
Which ETF is bigger: JHSC or QVMS?
As of July 30, 2026, JHSC holds $727.93 M in assets under management (AUM), while QVMS manages $250.60 M.
What sectors do the JHSC and QVMS ETFs invest in?
JHSC leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, QVMS focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the JHSC ETF and QVMS ETF?
JHSC top holdings include Littelfuse, Inc., Arrow Electronics, Inc. and Element Solutions, Inc.. QVMS holds in its top three: Argan, Inc., Element Solutions, Inc. and ViaSat, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: JHSC or QVMS?
JHSC holds 486 securities with 7.76% of its assets in the top 15. QVMS has 539 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.84%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
