Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JHSCvsFNDAETF Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF (FNDA) is part of the US Small Cap segment. JHSC's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, FNDA's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. JHSC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.46%, versus 0.25% for FNDA. JHSC is up 3.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. FNDA performs better with 4.44% YTD performance, and +$28M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JHSC and FNDA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JHSC vs FNDA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JHSC FNDA | -6.03%-5.70% | +1.12%+1.89% | +3.54%+4.44% | +18.86%+21.39% | +43.67%+42.58% | +34.79%+35.83% |
| Flows | JHSC FNDA | +$13M+$8M | +$11M+$32M | +$8M+$28M | +$96M-$733M | +$189M+$877M | +$123M+$3.01B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JHSC FNDA | +16.01%+16.62% | +21.73%+22.09% | +19.10%+19.83% | +20.29%+21.05% |
| Max drawdown | JHSC FNDA | -6.25%-5.72% | -15.53%-15.60% | -25.36%-25.89% | -25.36%-25.89% |
| Max drawdown duration | JHSC FNDA | 16d29d | 46d49d | 379d379d | 379d379d |
JHSC | FNDA | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.49 | $32.80 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $43.45 | $32.93 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JHSC | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JHSC | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.49 | $32.80 |
| 1D performance | +0.09% | -0.39% |
| AuM | $670.54 M | $9.40 B |
| E/R | 0.46% | 0.25% |
JHSC | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | John Hancock Investments | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Small Index |
| N° of holdings | 477 | 827 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 11, 2017 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JHSC and FNDA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, JHSC is up 3.54% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDA has returned 4.44%. That puts FNDA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JHSC or FNDA?
Year-to-date, the JHSC ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to +$28M for FNDA.
Which ETF is more volatile: JHSC or FNDA?
Over the past year, JHSC had a volatility of 21.73%, while FNDA experienced 22.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: JHSC or FNDA?
As of March 10, 2026, JHSC holds $670.54 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDA manages $9.40 B.
What sectors do the JHSC and FNDA ETFs invest in?
JHSC leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, FNDA focuses on Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the JHSC ETF and FNDA ETF?
JHSC top holdings include US80004C2008, REVOLUTION MEDICINES INC and HECLA MINING. FNDA holds in its top three: COMPASS, LUMENTUM HOLDINGS and ECHOSTAR.
Which ETF is more diversified: JHSC or FNDA?
JHSC holds 510 securities with 9.62% of its assets in the top 15. FNDA has 889 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.51%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
