Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JHMMvsMCDSETF Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. JHMM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.42%, versus 0.35% for MCDS. JHMM is up 1.86% year-to-date (YTD) with +$436M in YTD flows. MCDS performs worse with 0.53% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JHMM and MCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JHMM vs MCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JHMM MCDS | -4.44%-4.42% | +0.79%-0.26% | +1.86%+0.53% | +19.24%+14.39% | +50.34%n/a | +42.79%n/a |
| Flows | JHMM MCDS | +$334M- | +$462M- | +$436M- | +$563M+$32K | +$917M- | +$1.92B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JHMM MCDS | +14.39%+13.47% | +19.50%+19.14% | +16.40%n/a | +18.21%n/a |
| Max drawdown | JHMM MCDS | -6.66%-6.28% | -14.25%-14.55% | -21.83%n/a | -24.10%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | JHMM MCDS | 14d14d | 46d46d | 269dn/a | 835dn/a |
JHMM | MCDS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 3:34 PM | $66.78 | $58.84 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $66.70 | $59.88 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JHMM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JHMM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $66.78 | $58.84 |
| 1D performance | +0.12% | -1.74% |
| AuM | $5.10 B | $7.06 M |
| E/R | 0.42% | 0.35% |
JHMM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | John Hancock Investments | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 603 | 174 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2015 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JHMM and MCDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, JHMM is up 1.86% year-to-date (YTD), while MCDS has returned 0.53%. That puts JHMM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JHMM or MCDS?
Year-to-date, the JHMM ETF saw +$436M in flows, compared to - for MCDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: JHMM or MCDS?
Over the past year, JHMM had a volatility of 19.5%, while MCDS experienced 19.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: JHMM or MCDS?
As of March 12, 2026, JHMM holds $5.10 B in assets under management (AUM), while MCDS manages $7.06 M.
What sectors do the JHMM and MCDS ETFs invest in?
JHMM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, MCDS focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the JHMM ETF and MCDS ETF?
JHMM top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, CIENA and WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY. MCDS holds in its top three: WESTERN DIGITAL, HOWMET AEROSPACE INC and CARDINAL HEALTH.
Which ETF is more diversified: JHMM or MCDS?
JHMM holds 663 securities with 7.91% of its assets in the top 15. MCDS has 180 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.28%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
