JHMMvsMCDSETF Comparison
VS
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Industrials. JHMM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.42%, versus 0.35% for MCDS. JHMM is up 12.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$875M in YTD flows. MCDS performs better with 15.6% YTD performance, and +$38K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JHMM and MCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
JHMM vs MCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JHMM MCDS | +2.91%+3.46% | -0.75%-0.35% | +12.73%+15.60% | +15.91%+18.48% | +70.63%n/a | +39.98%n/a |
| Flows | JHMM MCDS | +$13M-$1M | +$152M+$43K | +$875M+$38K | +$965M+$38K | +$1.08B- | +$2.11B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JHMM MCDS | +11.49%+10.98% | +13.85%+12.97% | +16.11%n/a | +18.20%n/a |
| Max drawdown | JHMM MCDS | -7.57%-7.51% | -8.57%-7.51% | -21.83%n/a | -24.10%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | JHMM MCDS | 75d75d | 49d75d | 269dn/a | 835dn/a |
Trading data
JHMM | MCDS | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $73.57 | $67.16 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $74.50 | $67.92 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexJHMM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
JHMM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.57 | $67.16 |
| 1D performance | -1.25% | -1.11% |
| AuM | $6.04 B | $8.07 M |
| E/R | 0.42% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
JHMM | MCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | John Hancock Investments | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 651 | 203 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2015 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
JHMM
USA
95.22%
Other
4.78%
MCDS
USA
96.83%
Other
3.17%
Sectors
JHMM
Finance
22.27%
Technology
15.61%
Industrials
15.45%
Healthcare
13.21%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.82%
Other
25.64%
MCDS
Finance
20.88%
Technology
18.32%
Industrials
15.58%
Healthcare
11.98%
Other
33.25%
Advertisement
Diversification
JHMM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.18%
MCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.37%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
JHMM
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
0.61%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.55%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.54%
Coherent Corp.
0.50%
AMETEK, Inc.
0.49%
Flex Ltd.
0.49%
State Street Corp.
0.48%
Devon Energy Corp.
0.48%
eBay, Inc.
0.47%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
0.45%
Twilio, Inc.
0.45%
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
0.43%
NetApp, Inc.
0.42%
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.41%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
0.41%
MCDS
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.79%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
1.56%
Natera, Inc.
1.42%
State Street Corp.
1.22%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
1.20%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.20%
Snowflake, Inc.
1.15%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.13%
M&T Bank Corp.
1.01%
Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
0.98%
AMETEK, Inc.
0.97%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
0.96%
Dover Corp.
0.95%
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
0.93%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
0.90%
Frequently asked questions about JHMM and MCDS
How have the JHMM and MCDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, JHMM is up 12.73% year-to-date (YTD), while MCDS has returned 15.6%. That puts MCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JHMM or MCDS?
Year-to-date, the JHMM ETF saw +$875M in flows, compared to +$38K for MCDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: JHMM or MCDS?
Over the past year, JHMM had a volatility of 13.85%, while MCDS experienced 12.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: JHMM or MCDS?
As of October 30, 2026, JHMM holds $6.04 B in assets under management (AUM), while MCDS manages $8.07 M.
What sectors do the JHMM and MCDS ETFs invest in?
JHMM leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, MCDS focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the JHMM ETF and MCDS ETF?
JHMM top holdings include Keysight Technologies, Inc., Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc.. MCDS holds in its top three: Marathon Petroleum Corp., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. and Natera, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: JHMM or MCDS?
JHMM holds 657 securities with 7.18% of its assets in the top 15. MCDS has 203 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.37%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
