Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JHMMvsIWRETF Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. JHMM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.42%, versus 0.18% for IWR. JHMM is up 1.86% year-to-date (YTD) with +$436M in YTD flows. IWR performs worse with 0.96% YTD performance, and +$281M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JHMM and IWR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JHMM vs IWR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JHMM IWR | -4.44%-3.37% | +0.79%-0.19% | +1.86%+0.96% | +19.24%+17.17% | +50.34%+51.37% | +42.79%+39.23% |
| Flows | JHMM IWR | +$334M+$566M | +$462M+$729M | +$436M+$281M | +$563M+$4.17B | +$917M+$7.76B | +$1.92B+$10.09B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JHMM IWR | +14.39%+14.02% | +19.50%+19.18% | +16.40%+16.03% | +18.21%+18.23% |
| Max drawdown | JHMM IWR | -6.66%-6.03% | -14.25%-14.39% | -21.83%-21.08% | -24.10%-26.20% |
| Max drawdown duration | JHMM IWR | 14d14d | 46d46d | 269d239d | 835d854d |
JHMM | IWR | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $66.70 | $97.20 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $67.99 | $98.96 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JHMM | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JHMM | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $66.70 | $97.20 |
| 1D performance | -1.90% | -1.78% |
| AuM | $5.10 B | $47.10 B |
| E/R | 0.42% | 0.18% |
JHMM | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | John Hancock Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index | Russell Midcap Index |
| N° of holdings | 603 | 724 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2015 | July 17, 2001 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JHMM and IWR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, JHMM is up 1.86% year-to-date (YTD), while IWR has returned 0.96%. That puts JHMM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JHMM or IWR?
Year-to-date, the JHMM ETF saw +$436M in flows, compared to +$281M for IWR.
Which ETF is more volatile: JHMM or IWR?
Over the past year, JHMM had a volatility of 19.5%, while IWR experienced 19.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: JHMM or IWR?
As of March 12, 2026, JHMM holds $5.10 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWR manages $47.10 B.
What sectors do the JHMM and IWR ETFs invest in?
JHMM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, IWR focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the JHMM ETF and IWR ETF?
JHMM top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, CIENA and WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY. IWR holds in its top three: WESTERN DIGITAL, ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON.
Which ETF is more diversified: JHMM or IWR?
JHMM holds 663 securities with 7.91% of its assets in the top 15. IWR has 808 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.71%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
