Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JHMLvsRECSETF Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. JHML's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, RECS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. JHML is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.15% for RECS. JHML is down -0.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22M in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with -1.84% YTD performance, and +$282M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JHML and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JHML vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JHML RECS | -2.77%-2.94% | -0.89%-2.73% | -0.81%-1.84% | +19.54%+22.98% | +67.83%+82.47% | +66.97%+95.09% |
| Flows | JHML RECS | +$20M+$174M | +$26M+$487M | +$22M+$282M | -$17M+$2.28B | -$38M+$4.23B | +$30M+$4.20B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JHML RECS | +11.52%+11.63% | +17.54%+17.97% | +14.24%+14.48% | +16.32%+16.55% |
| Max drawdown | JHML RECS | -4.36%-3.61% | -13.37%-13.84% | -18.02%-18.49% | -23.44%-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | JHML RECS | 31d30d | 45d45d | 127d126d | 708d573d |
JHML | RECS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 7:59 PM | $79.14 | $39.43 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $80.37 | $39.47 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JHML | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JHML | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $79.14 | $39.43 |
| 1D performance | -1.54% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $1.05 B | $4.95 B |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.15% |
JHML | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | John Hancock Investments | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 712 | 331 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2015 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JHML and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, JHML is down -0.81% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has lost -1.84%. That puts JHML better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JHML or RECS?
Year-to-date, the JHML ETF saw +$22M in flows, compared to +$282M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: JHML or RECS?
Over the past year, JHML had a volatility of 17.54%, while RECS experienced 17.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: JHML or RECS?
As of March 12, 2026, JHML holds $1.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $4.95 B.
What sectors do the JHML and RECS ETFs invest in?
JHML leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the JHML ETF and RECS ETF?
JHML top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: JHML or RECS?
JHML holds 773 securities with 27.75% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 336 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.28%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
