Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JHMLvsOMFLETF Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. JHML's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, OMFL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. JHML is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.29% for OMFL. JHML is down -1.18% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22M in YTD flows. OMFL performs better with -0.07% YTD performance, and -$328M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JHML and OMFL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JHML vs OMFL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JHML OMFL | -3.57%-2.39% | -1.18%+0.09% | -1.18%-0.07% | +20.67%+17.97% | +67.19%+42.26% | +65.02%+47.22% |
| Flows | JHML OMFL | +$20M-$145M | +$26M-$360M | +$22M-$328M | -$17M-$959M | -$38M+$438M | +$30M+$1.58B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JHML OMFL | +11.54%+14.19% | +17.50%+16.71% | +14.23%+14.72% | +16.32%+16.79% |
| Max drawdown | JHML OMFL | -4.72%-3.95% | -13.37%-10.72% | -18.02%-15.62% | -23.44%-22.09% |
| Max drawdown duration | JHML OMFL | 32d16d | 45d37d | 127d133d | 708d560d |
JHML | OMFL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $78.82 | $61.06 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $79.14 | $61.23 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JHML | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JHML | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $78.82 | $61.06 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | -0.28% |
| AuM | $1.05 B | $4.31 B |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.29% |
JHML | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | John Hancock Investments | Invesco |
| Benchmark | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index | Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index |
| N° of holdings | 712 | 863 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2015 | November 8, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JHML and OMFL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, JHML is down -1.18% year-to-date (YTD), while OMFL has lost -0.07%. That puts OMFL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JHML or OMFL?
Year-to-date, the JHML ETF saw +$22M in flows, compared to -$328M for OMFL.
Which ETF is more volatile: JHML or OMFL?
Over the past year, JHML had a volatility of 17.5%, while OMFL experienced 16.71%.
Which ETF is bigger: JHML or OMFL?
As of March 13, 2026, JHML holds $1.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while OMFL manages $4.31 B.
What sectors do the JHML and OMFL ETFs invest in?
JHML leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, OMFL focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the JHML ETF and OMFL ETF?
JHML top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. OMFL holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: JHML or OMFL?
JHML holds 773 securities with 27.75% of its assets in the top 15. OMFL has 932 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.47%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
