Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
JHMLvsJQUAETF Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and JPMorgan US Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. JHML's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, JQUA's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. JHML is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.12% for JQUA. JHML is up 0.73% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. JQUA performs worse with -0.1% YTD performance, and -$596M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JHML and JQUA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JHML vs JQUA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JHML JQUA | -2.76%-1.74% | -0.37%-1.51% | +0.73%-0.10% | +21.61%+13.58% | +70.43%+68.77% | +70.07%+82.04% |
| Flows | JHML JQUA | -$4M-$459M | +$2M-$579M | -$2M-$596M | -$46M+$752M | -$61M+$4.36B | +$8M+$4.81B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JHML JQUA | +11.27%+10.80% | +17.47%+16.52% | +14.22%+13.52% | +16.31%+15.60% |
| Max drawdown | JHML JQUA | -3.05%-2.80% | -13.37%-12.33% | -18.02%-16.77% | -23.44%-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | JHML JQUA | 30d43d | 45d46d | 127d134d | 708d560d |
JHML | JQUA | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $79.14 | $62.33 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $80.37 | $63.08 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
JHML | JQUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
JHML | JQUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $79.14 | $62.33 |
| 1D performance | -1.54% | -1.19% |
| AuM | $1.04 B | $7.00 B |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.12% |
JHML | JQUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | John Hancock Investments | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index | JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 712 | 279 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 28, 2015 | November 9, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the JHML and JQUA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, JHML is up 0.73% year-to-date (YTD), while JQUA has lost -0.1%. That puts JHML better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JHML or JQUA?
Year-to-date, the JHML ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to -$596M for JQUA.
Which ETF is more volatile: JHML or JQUA?
Over the past year, JHML had a volatility of 17.47%, while JQUA experienced 16.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: JHML or JQUA?
As of March 11, 2026, JHML holds $1.04 B in assets under management (AUM), while JQUA manages $7.00 B.
What sectors do the JHML and JQUA ETFs invest in?
JHML leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, JQUA focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the JHML ETF and JQUA ETF?
JHML top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. JQUA holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, NVIDIA and META PLATFORMS.
Which ETF is more diversified: JHML or JQUA?
JHML holds 773 securities with 27.75% of its assets in the top 15. JQUA has 289 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.05%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
