JABSvsPCMMETF Comparison
Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) and BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. Both ETFs have the same top 2 sector exposures: Industrials and Finance. JABS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.68% for PCMM. JABS is up 2.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$48M in YTD flows. PCMM performs better with 4.18% YTD performance, and +$78M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JABS and PCMM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JABS vs PCMM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JABS PCMM | +0.27%+0.48% | +0.15%+1.50% | +2.06%+4.18% | +2.96%+5.43% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | JABS PCMM | +$41M+$53M | +$44M+$68M | +$48M+$78M | +$48M+$93M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JABS PCMM | +1.32%+0.26% | +1.39%+1.04% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | JABS PCMM | -0.86%n/a | -1.06%-1.15% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | JABS PCMM | 52dn/a | 67d75d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
JABS | PCMM | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.44 | $49.96 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $49.47 | $49.92 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
JABS | PCMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.44 | $49.96 |
| 1D performance | -0.06% | +0.08% |
| AuM | $177.81 M | $262.66 M |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.68% |
JABS | PCMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Janus Henderson Investors | Bondbloxx Investment Management LLC |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 71 | 10 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 23, 2025 | December 2, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
