JABSvsACLOETF Comparison
Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. Both ETFs have the same top 2 sector exposures: Industrials and Finance. JABS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.2% for ACLO. JABS is up 2.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$48M in YTD flows. ACLO performs better with 3.95% YTD performance, and +$247M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JABS and ACLO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
JABS vs ACLO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JABS ACLO | +0.27%+0.38% | +0.15%+1.23% | +2.06%+3.95% | +2.96%+5.07% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | JABS ACLO | +$41M+$4M | +$44M+$68M | +$48M+$247M | +$48M+$281M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | JABS ACLO | +1.32%+0.18% | +1.39%+0.30% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | JABS ACLO | -0.86%n/a | -1.06%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | JABS ACLO | 52dn/a | 67dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
JABS | ACLO | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.44 | $50.48 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $49.47 | $50.45 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
JABS | ACLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.44 | $50.48 |
| 1D performance | -0.06% | +0.06% |
| AuM | $177.81 M | $584.00 M |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.2% |
JABS | ACLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Janus Henderson Investors | TCW |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 71 | 39 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 23, 2025 | November 15, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
