Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IYJvsGDIVETF Comparison
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) belongs to the US Industrials segment. Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. IYJ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Materials. In contrast, GDIV's top sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. IYJ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.5% for GDIV. IYJ is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$724M in YTD flows. GDIV performs better with 4.02% YTD performance, and -$523K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IYJ and GDIV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IYJ vs GDIV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IYJ GDIV | -4.94%-3.72% | +2.08%+2.92% | +3.42%+4.02% | +19.83%+18.89% | +63.82%+58.33% | +54.61%n/a |
| Flows | IYJ GDIV | +$349M+$2M | +$761M-$1M | +$724M-$523K | +$649M-$81M | +$734M-$21M | +$536M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IYJ GDIV | +15.56%+11.77% | +19.66%+17.28% | +16.13%+14.06% | +17.91%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IYJ GDIV | -5.41%-5.14% | -13.69%-13.27% | -19.72%-18.62% | -26.37%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IYJ GDIV | 9d27d | 43d46d | 211d179d | 832dn/a |
IYJ | GDIV | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $149.43 | $16.92 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $153.22 | $17.23 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IYJ | GDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IYJ | GDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $149.43 | $16.92 |
| 1D performance | -2.47% | -1.78% |
| AuM | $2.50 B | $224.46 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.5% |
IYJ | GDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Harbor Capital |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Industrials 40 Act 15/22.5 Daily Capped Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 178 | 44 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 12, 2000 | May 23, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IYJ and GDIV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IYJ is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD), while GDIV has returned 4.02%. That puts GDIV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IYJ or GDIV?
Year-to-date, the IYJ ETF saw +$724M in flows, compared to -$523K for GDIV.
Which ETF is more volatile: IYJ or GDIV?
Over the past year, IYJ had a volatility of 19.66%, while GDIV experienced 17.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: IYJ or GDIV?
As of March 11, 2026, IYJ holds $2.50 B in assets under management (AUM), while GDIV manages $224.46 M.
What sectors do the IYJ and GDIV ETFs invest in?
IYJ leans toward sectors like Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, GDIV focuses on Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IYJ ETF and GDIV ETF?
IYJ top holdings include VISA INCORPORATION, MASTERCARD and GENERAL ELECTRIC. GDIV holds in its top three: BROADCOM LIMITED, APPLE and MUELLER INDUSTRIES.
Which ETF is more diversified: IYJ or GDIV?
IYJ holds 198 securities with 44.21% of its assets in the top 15. GDIV has 44 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.47%.
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
Harbor Capital Advisors transfers three ETFs to the NYSE trading floor
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
