Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IYJvsFOWFETF Comparison
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) belongs to the US Industrials segment. Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) is part of the segment. IYJ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Materials. In contrast, FOWF's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Communication Services. IYJ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.6% for FOWF. IYJ is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$724M in YTD flows. FOWF performs better with 9.21% YTD performance, and +$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IYJ and FOWF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IYJ vs FOWF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IYJ FOWF | -4.94%+1.12% | +2.08%+9.64% | +3.42%+9.21% | +19.83%+37.06% | +63.82%n/a | +54.61%n/a |
| Flows | IYJ FOWF | +$349M+$5M | +$761M+$7M | +$724M+$6M | +$649M+$12M | +$734M- | +$536M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IYJ FOWF | +15.56%+14.40% | +19.66%+15.98% | +16.13%n/a | +17.91%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IYJ FOWF | -5.41%-2.92% | -13.69%-12.32% | -19.72%n/a | -26.37%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IYJ FOWF | 9d10d | 43d35d | 211dn/a | 832dn/a |
IYJ | FOWF | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $149.43 | |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $153.22 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IYJ | FOWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IYJ | FOWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $149.43 | – |
| 1D performance | -2.47% | – |
| AuM | $2.50 B | $14.39 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.6% |
IYJ | FOWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Industrials 40 Act 15/22.5 Daily Capped Index | Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index |
| N° of holdings | 178 | 83 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 12, 2000 | December 17, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IYJ and FOWF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IYJ is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD), while FOWF has returned 9.21%. That puts FOWF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IYJ or FOWF?
Year-to-date, the IYJ ETF saw +$724M in flows, compared to +$6M for FOWF.
Which ETF is more volatile: IYJ or FOWF?
Over the past year, IYJ had a volatility of 19.66%, while FOWF experienced 15.98%.
Which ETF is bigger: IYJ or FOWF?
As of March 11, 2026, IYJ holds $2.50 B in assets under management (AUM), while FOWF manages $14.39 M.
What sectors do the IYJ and FOWF ETFs invest in?
IYJ leans toward sectors like Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, FOWF focuses on Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IYJ ETF and FOWF ETF?
IYJ top holdings include VISA INCORPORATION, MASTERCARD and GENERAL ELECTRIC. FOWF holds in its top three: LOCKHEED MARTIN, BOEING U and RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD.
Which ETF is more diversified: IYJ or FOWF?
IYJ holds 198 securities with 44.21% of its assets in the top 15. FOWF has 86 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.99%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
