Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IYJvsFIDUETF Comparison
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) belong to the same industry segment: US Industrials. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Materials. IYJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.08% for FIDU. IYJ is up 0.85% year-to-date (YTD) with +$724M in YTD flows. FIDU performs better with 9.88% YTD performance, and +$236M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IYJ and FIDU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IYJ vs FIDU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IYJ FIDU | -5.96%-3.47% | +0.11%+7.66% | +0.85%+9.88% | +16.72%+34.18% | +59.76%+83.71% | +49.51%+89.52% |
| Flows | IYJ FIDU | +$366M+$61M | +$753M+$273M | +$724M+$236M | +$649M+$295M | +$734M+$599M | +$516M+$594M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IYJ FIDU | +16.37%+17.16% | +19.83%+19.86% | +16.18%+16.79% | +17.95%+17.96% |
| Max drawdown | IYJ FIDU | -7.76%-5.36% | -13.69%-13.46% | -19.72%-20.28% | -26.37%-22.91% |
| Max drawdown duration | IYJ FIDU | 10d9d | 43d37d | 211d212d | 832d589d |
IYJ | FIDU | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $149.43 | $88.29 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $153.22 | $90.70 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IYJ | FIDU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IYJ | FIDU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $149.43 | $88.29 |
| 1D performance | -2.47% | -2.66% |
| AuM | $2.44 B | $1.93 B |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.08% |
IYJ | FIDU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Industrials 40 Act 15/22.5 Daily Capped Index | MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index |
| N° of holdings | 178 | 323 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 12, 2000 | October 21, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IYJ and FIDU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IYJ is up 0.85% year-to-date (YTD), while FIDU has returned 9.88%. That puts FIDU better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IYJ or FIDU?
Year-to-date, the IYJ ETF saw +$724M in flows, compared to +$236M for FIDU.
Which ETF is more volatile: IYJ or FIDU?
Over the past year, IYJ had a volatility of 19.83%, while FIDU experienced 19.86%.
Which ETF is bigger: IYJ or FIDU?
As of March 12, 2026, IYJ holds $2.44 B in assets under management (AUM), while FIDU manages $1.93 B.
What sectors do the IYJ and FIDU ETFs invest in?
IYJ leans toward sectors like Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, FIDU focuses on Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the IYJ ETF and FIDU ETF?
IYJ top holdings include VISA INCORPORATION, MASTERCARD and GENERAL ELECTRIC. FIDU holds in its top three: GENERAL ELECTRIC, CATERPILLAR and RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD.
Which ETF is more diversified: IYJ or FIDU?
IYJ holds 198 securities with 44.21% of its assets in the top 15. FIDU has 359 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.78%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
