Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWYvsIWFGETF Comparison
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. IWY is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 1.2% for IWFG. IWY is down -6.43% year-to-date (YTD) with +$137M in YTD flows. IWFG performs worse with -7.79% YTD performance, and -$536K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWY and IWFG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWY vs IWFG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWY IWFG | -1.19%-2.04% | -5.78%-9.07% | -6.43%-7.79% | +21.04%+14.81% | +106.91%+92.36% | +100.89%n/a |
| Flows | IWY IWFG | +$26M+$1K | -$387M-$536K | +$137M-$536K | +$658M+$46M | +$3.99B+$47M | +$5.67B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWY IWFG | +15.79%+16.73% | +22.39%+22.57% | +19.24%+19.50% | +21.51%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWY IWFG | -7.76%-9.94% | -15.39%-14.95% | -23.25%-21.89% | -32.74%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWY IWFG | 74d90d | 45d37d | 192d133d | 715dn/a |
IWY | IWFG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:50 PM | $260.68 | $48.39 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $259.02 | $49.25 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWY | IWFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWY | IWFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $260.68 | $48.39 |
| 1D performance | +0.64% | -1.73% |
| AuM | $15.29 B | $54.19 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 1.2% |
IWY | IWFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | New York Life Investments |
| Benchmark | Russell Top 200 Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 105 | 24 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2009 | June 23, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWY and IWFG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWY is down -6.43% year-to-date (YTD), while IWFG has lost -7.79%. That puts IWY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWY or IWFG?
Year-to-date, the IWY ETF saw +$137M in flows, compared to -$536K for IWFG.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWY or IWFG?
Over the past year, IWY had a volatility of 22.39%, while IWFG experienced 22.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWY or IWFG?
As of March 12, 2026, IWY holds $15.29 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWFG manages $54.19 M.
What sectors do the IWY and IWFG ETFs invest in?
IWY leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWFG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IWY ETF and IWFG ETF?
IWY top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IWFG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and AMAZON.COM INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWY or IWFG?
IWY holds 111 securities with 71.69% of its assets in the top 15. IWFG has 24 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.95%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
