Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWYvsACGRETF Comparison
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and American Century Sustainable Growth ETF (ACGR) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. IWY's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, ACGR's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. IWY is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.39% for ACGR. IWY is down -6.43% year-to-date (YTD) with +$137M in YTD flows. ACGR performs better with -4.88% YTD performance, and +$634K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWY and ACGR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWY vs ACGR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWY ACGR | -1.19%-1.50% | -5.78%-6.13% | -6.43%-4.88% | +21.04%+22.24% | +106.91%+86.84% | +100.89%n/a |
| Flows | IWY ACGR | +$26M- | -$387M-$3M | +$137M+$634K | +$658M-$2M | +$3.99B+$1M | +$5.67B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWY ACGR | +15.79%+15.71% | +22.39%+22.47% | +19.24%+19.01% | +21.51%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWY ACGR | -7.76%-7.30% | -15.39%-15.52% | -23.25%-24.51% | -32.74%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWY ACGR | 74d73d | 45d45d | 192d198d | 715dn/a |
IWY | ACGR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 2:58 PM | $257.97 | $61.71 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $259.02 | $62.73 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWY | ACGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWY | ACGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $257.97 | $61.71 |
| 1D performance | -0.41% | -1.62% |
| AuM | $15.29 B | $16.31 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.39% |
IWY | ACGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | American Century Investments |
| Benchmark | Russell Top 200 Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 105 | 75 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2009 | July 1, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWY and ACGR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWY is down -6.43% year-to-date (YTD), while ACGR has lost -4.88%. That puts ACGR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWY or ACGR?
Year-to-date, the IWY ETF saw +$137M in flows, compared to +$634K for ACGR.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWY or ACGR?
Over the past year, IWY had a volatility of 22.39%, while ACGR experienced 22.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWY or ACGR?
As of March 12, 2026, IWY holds $15.29 B in assets under management (AUM), while ACGR manages $16.31 M.
What sectors do the IWY and ACGR ETFs invest in?
IWY leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, ACGR focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the IWY ETF and ACGR ETF?
IWY top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ACGR holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWY or ACGR?
IWY holds 111 securities with 71.69% of its assets in the top 15. ACGR has 80 securities and a top 15 weight of 71.37%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
