Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWSvsREMCETF Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) belongs to the US Mid Cap Value segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. IWS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, REMC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. IWS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.23%, versus 0.32% for REMC. IWS is up 4.73% year-to-date (YTD) with -$207M in YTD flows. REMC performs worse with 1.23% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWS and REMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWS vs REMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWS REMC | -3.23%-2.80% | +3.53%-0.06% | +4.73%+1.23% | +19.38%n/a | +49.21%n/a | +47.68%n/a |
| Flows | IWS REMC | +$71M-$2M | -$79M+$3M | -$207M-$2M | -$417M- | -$2.16B- | -$2.25B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWS REMC | +13.30%+12.42% | +18.28%n/a | +15.60%n/a | +17.33%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWS REMC | -4.33%-3.42% | -13.73%n/a | -20.45%n/a | -21.32%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWS REMC | 8d11d | 46dn/a | 269dn/a | 785dn/a |
IWS | REMC | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $147.45 | $20.13 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $147.69 | $20.14 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWS | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWS | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $147.45 | $20.13 |
| 1D performance | -0.16% | -0.09% |
| AuM | $14.80 B | $3.05 M |
| E/R | 0.23% | 0.32% |
IWS | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Russell Midcap Value Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 641 | 266 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 17, 2001 | December 11, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWS and REMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, IWS is up 4.73% year-to-date (YTD), while REMC has returned 1.23%. That puts IWS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWS or REMC?
Year-to-date, the IWS ETF saw -$207M in flows, compared to -$2M for REMC.
Which ETF is bigger: IWS or REMC?
As of March 10, 2026, IWS holds $14.80 B in assets under management (AUM), while REMC manages $3.05 M.
What sectors do the IWS and REMC ETFs invest in?
IWS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, REMC focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWS ETF and REMC ETF?
IWS top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, CORNING and CUMMINS. REMC holds in its top three: HILTON INC, PHILLIPS 66 and VALERO ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWS or REMC?
IWS holds 714 securities with 9.98% of its assets in the top 15. REMC has 271 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.89%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
