Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWSvsIWRETF Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) belongs to the US Mid Cap Value segment. iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. IWS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, IWR's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. IWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.23%, versus 0.18% for IWR. IWS is up 4.73% year-to-date (YTD) with -$207M in YTD flows. IWR performs worse with 3.02% YTD performance, and +$231M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWS and IWR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWS vs IWR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWS IWR | -3.23%-3.00% | +3.53%+1.60% | +4.73%+3.02% | +19.38%+18.58% | +49.21%+52.68% | +47.68%+44.89% |
| Flows | IWS IWR | +$71M+$588M | -$79M+$665M | -$207M+$231M | -$417M+$4.16B | -$2.16B+$7.72B | -$2.25B+$10.08B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWS IWR | +13.30%+13.79% | +18.28%+19.11% | +15.60%+16.02% | +17.33%+18.22% |
| Max drawdown | IWS IWR | -4.33%-4.11% | -13.73%-14.39% | -20.45%-21.08% | -21.32%-26.20% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWS IWR | 8d12d | 46d46d | 269d239d | 785d854d |
IWS | IWR | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $147.45 | $98.96 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $147.69 | $99.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWS | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWS | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $147.45 | $98.96 |
| 1D performance | -0.16% | -0.26% |
| AuM | $14.80 B | $48.01 B |
| E/R | 0.23% | 0.18% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWS and IWR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, IWS is up 4.73% year-to-date (YTD), while IWR has returned 3.02%. That puts IWS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWS or IWR?
Year-to-date, the IWS ETF saw -$207M in flows, compared to +$231M for IWR.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWS or IWR?
Over the past year, IWS had a volatility of 18.28%, while IWR experienced 19.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWS or IWR?
As of March 10, 2026, IWS holds $14.80 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWR manages $48.01 B.
What sectors do the IWS and IWR ETFs invest in?
IWS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, IWR focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWS ETF and IWR ETF?
IWS top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, CORNING and CUMMINS. IWR holds in its top three: WESTERN DIGITAL, ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWS or IWR?
IWS holds 714 securities with 9.98% of its assets in the top 15. IWR has 808 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.71%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
