Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWRvsREMCETF Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. IWR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.32% for REMC. IWR is up 3.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$231M in YTD flows. REMC performs worse with 1.23% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWR and REMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWR vs REMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWR REMC | -3.00%-2.80% | +1.60%-0.06% | +3.02%+1.23% | +18.58%n/a | +52.68%n/a | +44.89%n/a |
| Flows | IWR REMC | +$588M-$2M | +$665M+$3M | +$231M-$2M | +$4.16B- | +$7.72B- | +$10.08B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWR REMC | +13.79%+12.42% | +19.11%n/a | +16.02%n/a | +18.22%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWR REMC | -4.11%-3.42% | -14.39%n/a | -21.08%n/a | -26.20%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWR REMC | 12d11d | 46dn/a | 239dn/a | 854dn/a |
IWR | REMC | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $98.96 | $20.13 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $99.22 | $20.14 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWR | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWR | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $98.96 | $20.13 |
| 1D performance | -0.26% | -0.09% |
| AuM | $48.01 B | $3.05 M |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.32% |
IWR | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Russell Midcap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 724 | 266 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 17, 2001 | December 11, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWR and REMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, IWR is up 3.02% year-to-date (YTD), while REMC has returned 1.23%. That puts IWR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWR or REMC?
Year-to-date, the IWR ETF saw +$231M in flows, compared to -$2M for REMC.
Which ETF is bigger: IWR or REMC?
As of March 10, 2026, IWR holds $48.01 B in assets under management (AUM), while REMC manages $3.05 M.
What sectors do the IWR and REMC ETFs invest in?
IWR leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, REMC focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWR ETF and REMC ETF?
IWR top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON. REMC holds in its top three: HILTON INC, PHILLIPS 66 and VALERO ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWR or REMC?
IWR holds 808 securities with 8.71% of its assets in the top 15. REMC has 271 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.89%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
