IWRvsREMCETF Comparison
VS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. IWR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.32% for REMC. IWR is up 8.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.99B in YTD flows. REMC performs worse with 4.94% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWR and REMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IWR vs REMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWR REMC | +8.68%+5.44% | +3.49%+2.17% | +8.05%+4.94% | +25.51%n/a | +56.94%n/a | +41.62%n/a |
| Flows | IWR REMC | +$1.13B- | +$2.41B-$2M | +$1.99B-$2M | +$4.13B- | +$9.72B- | +$11.54B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWR REMC | +16.22%+14.05% | +13.93%n/a | +15.97%n/a | +18.27%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWR REMC | -8.16%-6.72% | -8.16%n/a | -21.08%n/a | -26.20%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWR REMC | 49d49d | 49dn/a | 239dn/a | 854dn/a |
Trading data
IWR | REMC | |
Last sale 4/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $103.75 | $21.14 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $103.76 | $21.09 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
REMC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIWR | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IWR | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $103.75 | $21.14 |
| 1D performance | -0.01% | +0.20% |
| AuM | $52.09 B | $3.16 M |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
IWR | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Russell Midcap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 721 | 264 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 17, 2001 | December 11, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IWR
USA
93.69%
Other
6.31%
REMC
USA
89.37%
Other
10.63%
Sectors
IWR
Industrials
16.54%
Information Techn.
13.04%
Financials
12.07%
Consumer Discreti.
10.57%
Health Care
8.39%
Energy
7.34%
Other
32.04%
REMC
Industrials
14.47%
Information Techn.
13.78%
Financials
13.27%
Consumer Discreti.
10.79%
Health Care
8.74%
Energy
7.6%
Other
31.35%
Advertisement
Diversification
IWR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.59%
REMC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.87%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
IWR
CORNING
0.84%
VERTIV HOLDINGS
0.76%
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC
0.73%
WESTERN DIGITAL
0.73%
US80004C2008
0.72%
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
0.65%
QUANTA SERVICES
0.64%
VALERO ENERGY
0.60%
CUMMINS
0.59%
MARATHON PETROLEUM
0.58%
PHILLIPS 66
0.58%
ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP
0.55%
HILTON INC
0.55%
ROSS STORES
0.55%
KINDER MORGAN
0.52%
REMC
VALERO ENERGY
1.88%
PHILLIPS 66
1.84%
MARATHON PETROLEUM
1.83%
HILTON INC
1.61%
CIENA
1.40%
ALLSTATE
1.37%
KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES
1.26%
ELECTRONIC ARTS
1.19%
CORTEVA INC
1.13%
DELTA AIR LINES
1.09%
CBRE GROUP
1.09%
EXELON CORP
1.06%
CARDINAL HEALTH
1.06%
FORD MOTOR
1.05%
ROCKWELL AUTOMAT
1.01%
Frequently asked questions about IWR and REMC
How have the IWR and REMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, IWR is up 8.05% year-to-date (YTD), while REMC has returned 4.94%. That puts IWR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWR or REMC?
Year-to-date, the IWR ETF saw +$1.99B in flows, compared to -$2M for REMC.
Which ETF is bigger: IWR or REMC?
As of April 27, 2026, IWR holds $52.09 B in assets under management (AUM), while REMC manages $3.16 M.
What sectors do the IWR and REMC ETFs invest in?
IWR leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, REMC focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWR ETF and REMC ETF?
IWR top holdings include CORNING, VERTIV HOLDINGS and HOWMET AEROSPACE INC. REMC holds in its top three: VALERO ENERGY, PHILLIPS 66 and MARATHON PETROLEUM.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWR or REMC?
IWR holds 806 securities with 9.59% of its assets in the top 15. REMC has 270 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.87%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
