IWRvsONEOETF Comparison
VS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. IWR's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. In contrast, ONEO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Finance. IWR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.2% for ONEO. IWR is up 14.68% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3.95B in YTD flows. ONEO performs better with 19.45% YTD performance, and -$24M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWR and ONEO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IWR vs ONEO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWR ONEO | +1.12%+1.94% | +0.86%+1.09% | +14.68%+19.45% | +14.51%+20.46% | +72.09%+76.31% | +40.63%+57.52% |
| Flows | IWR ONEO | +$826M- | +$1.02B+$2M | +$3.95B-$24M | +$5.32B-$73M | +$11.44B-$165M | +$13.29B-$317M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWR ONEO | +11.41%+9.77% | +13.47%+12.86% | +15.76%+15.00% | +18.24%+17.22% |
| Max drawdown | IWR ONEO | -6.83%-6.73% | -8.16%-7.42% | -21.08%-19.59% | -26.20%-22.42% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWR ONEO | 68d68d | 49d48d | 239d260d | 854d757d |
Trading data
IWR | ONEO | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $110.03 | $153.72 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $109.47 | $152.98 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IWR | ONEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IWR | ONEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $110.03 | $153.72 |
| 1D performance | +0.51% | +0.49% |
| AuM | $56.99 B | $30.60 M |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
IWR | ONEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Russell Midcap Index | Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 808 | 914 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 17, 2001 | December 2, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IWR
USA
96.24%
Other
3.76%
ONEO
USA
94.89%
Other
5.11%
Sectors
IWR
Finance
21.61%
Technology
16.34%
Industrials
13.72%
Healthcare
11.84%
Other
36.48%
ONEO
Industrials
15.26%
Technology
15.06%
Finance
14.91%
Healthcare
11.89%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.41%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.98%
Other
26.5%
Advertisement
Diversification
IWR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.43%
ONEO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.56%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
IWR
Snowflake, Inc.
0.80%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
0.79%
Phillips 66
0.71%
Cloudflare, Inc.
0.69%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
0.58%
Datadog, Inc.
0.56%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.50%
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
0.49%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
0.49%
Royal Caribbean Group
0.49%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
0.48%
The Allstate Corp.
0.47%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
0.47%
United Rentals, Inc.
0.47%
Baker Hughes Co.
0.45%
ONEO
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
0.93%
The Allstate Corp.
0.66%
Expedia Group, Inc.
0.63%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
0.63%
Newmont Corp.
0.59%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
0.56%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.56%
Zoom Communications, Inc.
0.52%
McKesson Corp.
0.51%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
0.51%
TechnipFMC plc
0.51%
Ovintiv, Inc.
0.51%
Permian Resources Corp.
0.49%
Devon Energy Corp.
0.48%
Humana, Inc.
0.45%
Frequently asked questions about IWR and ONEO
How have the IWR and ONEO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, IWR is up 14.68% year-to-date (YTD), while ONEO has returned 19.45%. That puts ONEO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWR or ONEO?
Year-to-date, the IWR ETF saw +$3.95B in flows, compared to -$24M for ONEO.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWR or ONEO?
Over the past year, IWR had a volatility of 13.47%, while ONEO experienced 12.86%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWR or ONEO?
As of October 23, 2026, IWR holds $56.99 B in assets under management (AUM), while ONEO manages $30.60 M.
What sectors do the IWR and ONEO ETFs invest in?
IWR leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, ONEO focuses on Industrials, Technology and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the IWR ETF and ONEO ETF?
IWR top holdings include Snowflake, Inc., Marathon Petroleum Corp. and Phillips 66. ONEO holds in its top three: Anglogold Ashanti Plc, The Allstate Corp. and Expedia Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IWR or ONEO?
IWR holds 818 securities with 8.43% of its assets in the top 15. ONEO has 921 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.56%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
