Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWRvsONEOETF Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. IWR's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, ONEO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. IWR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.2% for ONEO. IWR is up 2.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$285M in YTD flows. ONEO performs better with 4.71% YTD performance, and -$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWR and ONEO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWR vs ONEO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWR ONEO | -3.17%-3.39% | +0.56%+2.90% | +2.81%+4.71% | +19.26%+20.55% | +54.13%+56.04% | +42.47%+57.80% |
| Flows | IWR ONEO | +$642M-$1M | +$778M-$74M | +$285M-$26M | +$4.18B-$74M | +$7.77B-$247M | +$10.12B-$298M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWR ONEO | +13.69%+12.93% | +19.09%+17.73% | +16.00%+15.31% | +18.21%+17.29% |
| Max drawdown | IWR ONEO | -4.31%-3.92% | -14.39%-12.69% | -21.08%-19.59% | -26.20%-22.42% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWR ONEO | 13d13d | 46d46d | 239d260d | 854d757d |
IWR | ONEO | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $97.20 | $135.45 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $98.96 | $135.48 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWR | ONEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWR | ONEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $97.20 | $135.45 |
| 1D performance | -1.78% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $47.96 B | $25.74 M |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.2% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWR and ONEO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IWR is up 2.81% year-to-date (YTD), while ONEO has returned 4.71%. That puts ONEO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWR or ONEO?
Year-to-date, the IWR ETF saw +$285M in flows, compared to -$26M for ONEO.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWR or ONEO?
Over the past year, IWR had a volatility of 19.09%, while ONEO experienced 17.73%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWR or ONEO?
As of March 11, 2026, IWR holds $47.96 B in assets under management (AUM), while ONEO manages $25.74 M.
What sectors do the IWR and ONEO ETFs invest in?
IWR leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, ONEO focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IWR ETF and ONEO ETF?
IWR top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON. ONEO holds in its top three: WESTERN DIGITAL, MCKESSON and DOLLAR GENERAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWR or ONEO?
IWR holds 808 securities with 8.71% of its assets in the top 15. ONEO has 902 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.21%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
