Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWRvsJHMMETF Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. IWR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.42% for JHMM. IWR is up 2.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$285M in YTD flows. JHMM performs better with 3.77% YTD performance, and +$152M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWR and JHMM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWR vs JHMM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWR JHMM | -3.17%-4.14% | +0.56%+1.45% | +2.81%+3.77% | +19.26%+21.39% | +54.13%+53.15% | +42.47%+46.27% |
| Flows | IWR JHMM | +$642M+$56M | +$778M+$178M | +$285M+$152M | +$4.18B+$288M | +$7.77B+$633M | +$10.12B+$1.64B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWR JHMM | +13.69%+14.10% | +19.09%+19.41% | +16.00%+16.37% | +18.21%+18.19% |
| Max drawdown | IWR JHMM | -4.31%-4.91% | -14.39%-14.25% | -21.08%-21.83% | -26.20%-24.10% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWR JHMM | 13d13d | 46d46d | 239d269d | 854d835d |
IWR | JHMM | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $97.20 | $66.74 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $98.96 | $67.99 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWR | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWR | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $97.20 | $66.74 |
| 1D performance | -1.78% | -1.84% |
| AuM | $47.96 B | $4.91 B |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.42% |
IWR | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | Russell Midcap Index | John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 724 | 603 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 17, 2001 | September 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWR and JHMM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IWR is up 2.81% year-to-date (YTD), while JHMM has returned 3.77%. That puts JHMM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWR or JHMM?
Year-to-date, the IWR ETF saw +$285M in flows, compared to +$152M for JHMM.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWR or JHMM?
Over the past year, IWR had a volatility of 19.09%, while JHMM experienced 19.41%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWR or JHMM?
As of March 11, 2026, IWR holds $47.96 B in assets under management (AUM), while JHMM manages $4.91 B.
What sectors do the IWR and JHMM ETFs invest in?
IWR leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, JHMM focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWR ETF and JHMM ETF?
IWR top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON. JHMM holds in its top three: WESTERN DIGITAL, CIENA and WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWR or JHMM?
IWR holds 808 securities with 8.71% of its assets in the top 15. JHMM has 663 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.91%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
