Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWRvsAVMCETF Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) and Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap. IWR's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, AVMC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Both IWR and AVMC have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%. IWR is up 2.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$285M in YTD flows. AVMC performs better with 3.52% YTD performance, and +$43M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWR and AVMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWR vs AVMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWR AVMC | -3.17%-3.90% | +0.56%+2.32% | +2.81%+3.52% | +19.26%+19.38% | +54.13%n/a | +42.47%n/a |
| Flows | IWR AVMC | +$642M+$20M | +$778M+$52M | +$285M+$43M | +$4.18B+$123M | +$7.77B- | +$10.12B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWR AVMC | +13.69%+13.84% | +19.09%+19.70% | +16.00%n/a | +18.21%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWR AVMC | -4.31%-4.66% | -14.39%-14.62% | -21.08%n/a | -26.20%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWR AVMC | 13d12d | 46d46d | 239dn/a | 854dn/a |
IWR | AVMC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $97.20 | $71.55 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $98.96 | $72.85 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWR | AVMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWR | AVMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $97.20 | $71.55 |
| 1D performance | -1.78% | -1.78% |
| AuM | $47.96 B | $306.42 M |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.18% |
IWR | AVMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | American Century Investments |
| Benchmark | Russell Midcap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 724 | 510 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 17, 2001 | November 8, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWR and AVMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IWR is up 2.81% year-to-date (YTD), while AVMC has returned 3.52%. That puts AVMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWR or AVMC?
Year-to-date, the IWR ETF saw +$285M in flows, compared to +$43M for AVMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWR or AVMC?
Over the past year, IWR had a volatility of 19.09%, while AVMC experienced 19.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWR or AVMC?
As of March 11, 2026, IWR holds $47.96 B in assets under management (AUM), while AVMC manages $306.42 M.
What sectors do the IWR and AVMC ETFs invest in?
IWR leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, AVMC focuses on Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IWR ETF and AVMC ETF?
IWR top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON. AVMC holds in its top three: WESTERN DIGITAL, ROCKWELL AUTOMAT and COMFORT SYSTEMS USA.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWR or AVMC?
IWR holds 808 securities with 8.71% of its assets in the top 15. AVMC has 528 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.68%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
