Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWPvsTSCMETF Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. IWP's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, TSCM's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. IWP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.23%, versus 0.55% for TSCM. IWP is down -2.84% year-to-date (YTD) with -$520M in YTD flows. TSCM performs worse with -5.03% YTD performance, and +$38M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWP and TSCM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWP vs TSCM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWP TSCM | -2.36%+0.16% | -5.93%n/a | -2.84%-5.03% | +14.47%n/a | +56.18%n/a | +32.36%n/a |
| Flows | IWP TSCM | -$14M+$12M | -$90M- | -$520M+$38M | +$1.19B- | +$1.86B- | +$499M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWP TSCM | +17.87%n/a | +23.45%n/a | +19.21%n/a | +22.35%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWP TSCM | -7.63%n/a | -16.33%n/a | -25.34%n/a | -38.70%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWP TSCM | 64dn/a | 38dn/a | 134dn/a | 1059dn/a |
IWP | TSCM | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $129.88 | $18.27 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $132.99 | $18.65 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWP | TSCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWP | TSCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $129.88 | $18.27 |
| 1D performance | -2.34% | -2.07% |
| AuM | $19.43 B | $39.14 M |
| E/R | 0.23% | 0.55% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWP and TSCM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IWP is down -2.84% year-to-date (YTD), while TSCM has lost -5.03%. That puts IWP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWP or TSCM?
Year-to-date, the IWP ETF saw -$520M in flows, compared to +$38M for TSCM.
Which ETF is bigger: IWP or TSCM?
As of March 11, 2026, IWP holds $19.43 B in assets under management (AUM), while TSCM manages $39.14 M.
What sectors do the IWP and TSCM ETFs invest in?
IWP leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, TSCM focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IWP ETF and TSCM ETF?
IWP top holdings include ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP, HOWMET AEROSPACE INC and VERTIV HOLDINGS. TSCM holds in its top three: REGAL REXNORD CORP, FLOOR AND DECOR HOLDINGS and CHENIERE ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWP or TSCM?
IWP holds 281 securities with 29.64% of its assets in the top 15. TSCM has 31 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.39%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
