Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWPvsPFUTETF Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. IWP's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, PFUT's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. IWP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.23%, versus 0.65% for PFUT. IWP is down -5.09% year-to-date (YTD) with -$514M in YTD flows. PFUT performs worse with -6.28% YTD performance, and -$386M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWP and PFUT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWP vs PFUT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWP PFUT | -2.21%-2.74% | -6.57%-7.84% | -5.09%-6.28% | +10.63%+5.97% | +52.57%+39.20% | +29.91%n/a |
| Flows | IWP PFUT | -$272K-$409M | -$126M-$380M | -$514M-$386M | +$1.21B-$329M | +$1.86B-$222M | +$526M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWP PFUT | +18.17%+16.93% | +23.55%+22.18% | +19.25%+18.51% | +22.38%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWP PFUT | -8.45%-9.09% | -16.33%-16.31% | -25.34%-27.52% | -38.70%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWP PFUT | 65d65d | 38d45d | 134d463d | 1059dn/a |
IWP | PFUT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $129.88 | $23.82 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $132.99 | $24.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWP | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWP | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $129.88 | $23.82 |
| 1D performance | -2.34% | -1.67% |
| AuM | $18.99 B | $4.75 M |
| E/R | 0.23% | 0.65% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWP and PFUT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWP is down -5.09% year-to-date (YTD), while PFUT has lost -6.28%. That puts IWP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWP or PFUT?
Year-to-date, the IWP ETF saw -$514M in flows, compared to -$386M for PFUT.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWP or PFUT?
Over the past year, IWP had a volatility of 23.55%, while PFUT experienced 22.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWP or PFUT?
As of March 12, 2026, IWP holds $18.99 B in assets under management (AUM), while PFUT manages $4.75 M.
What sectors do the IWP and PFUT ETFs invest in?
IWP leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, PFUT focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the IWP ETF and PFUT ETF?
IWP top holdings include ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP, HOWMET AEROSPACE INC and VERTIV HOLDINGS. PFUT holds in its top three: VERTIV HOLDINGS, HILTON INC and PENUMBRA.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWP or PFUT?
IWP holds 281 securities with 29.64% of its assets in the top 15. PFUT has 64 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.36%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
