IWPvsJMIDETF Comparison
VS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) and Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. IWP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.23%, versus 0.3% for JMID. IWP is up 0.99% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1.30B in YTD flows. JMID performs better with 7.94% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWP and JMID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IWP vs JMID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWP JMID | -4.69%-3.28% | -1.80%+0.28% | +0.99%+7.94% | -4.63%+3.57% | +46.66%n/a | +21.32%n/a |
| Flows | IWP JMID | -$506M-$823K | -$585M-$823K | -$1.30B+$2M | -$562M-$4M | +$800M- | +$419M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWP JMID | +18.32%+16.53% | +18.21%+17.60% | +19.86%n/a | +22.67%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWP JMID | -8.32%-6.68% | -14.82%-10.82% | -25.34%n/a | -38.70%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWP JMID | 43d26d | 245d171d | 134dn/a | 1059dn/a |
Trading data
IWP | JMID | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM | $136.97 | $31.14 |
| Previous close 09/11/2026 | $138.00 | $31.27 |
| Consolidated volume 09/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
JMID
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIWP | JMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IWP | JMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $136.97 | $31.14 |
| 1D performance | -0.75% | -0.40% |
| AuM | $19.37 B | $23.47 M |
| E/R | 0.23% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
IWP | JMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Janus Henderson Investors |
| Benchmark | Russell Midcap Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 265 | 93 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 17, 2001 | September 17, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IWP
USA
96.99%
Other
3.01%
JMID
USA
97.72%
Other
2.28%
Sectors
IWP
Technology
32.07%
Industrials
17.59%
Healthcare
13.47%
Consumer Services
10.45%
Finance
8.54%
Other
17.87%
JMID
Technology
35.13%
Industrials
16.11%
Healthcare
12.49%
Finance
8.98%
Consumer Services
7.8%
Other
19.49%
Advertisement
Diversification
IWP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.24%
JMID
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.62%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
IWP
Snowflake, Inc.
2.91%
Cloudflare, Inc.
2.61%
Datadog, Inc.
2.57%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
2.15%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
1.73%
Cencora, Inc.
1.70%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.67%
Targa Resources Corp.
1.66%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
1.61%
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
1.48%
Vistra Corp.
1.46%
Autodesk, Inc.
1.45%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
1.44%
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
1.43%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.38%
JMID
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
3.09%
DexCom, Inc.
2.74%
Snowflake, Inc.
2.50%
Teradyne, Inc.
2.47%
Expedia Group, Inc.
2.42%
Tapestry, Inc.
2.40%
Datadog, Inc.
2.31%
NetApp, Inc.
2.10%
HEICO Corp.
2.09%
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
1.94%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.93%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
1.93%
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
1.92%
eBay, Inc.
1.90%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
1.88%
Frequently asked questions about IWP and JMID
How have the IWP and JMID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, IWP is up 0.99% year-to-date (YTD), while JMID has returned 7.94%. That puts JMID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWP or JMID?
Year-to-date, the IWP ETF saw -$1.30B in flows, compared to +$2M for JMID.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWP or JMID?
Over the past year, IWP had a volatility of 18.21%, while JMID experienced 17.6%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWP or JMID?
As of September 11, 2026, IWP holds $19.37 B in assets under management (AUM), while JMID manages $23.47 M.
What sectors do the IWP and JMID ETFs invest in?
IWP leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, JMID focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the IWP ETF and JMID ETF?
IWP top holdings include Snowflake, Inc., Cloudflare, Inc. and Datadog, Inc.. JMID holds in its top three: Comfort Systems USA, Inc., DexCom, Inc. and Snowflake, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IWP or JMID?
IWP holds 267 securities with 27.24% of its assets in the top 15. JMID has 93 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.62%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
