Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWPvsJMIDETF Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) and Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap Growth. IWP's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, JMID's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Industrials. IWP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.23%, versus 0.3% for JMID. IWP is down -5.09% year-to-date (YTD) with -$514M in YTD flows. JMID performs better with -0.42% YTD performance, and -$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWP and JMID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWP vs JMID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWP JMID | -2.21%-3.42% | -6.57%-3.14% | -5.09%-0.42% | +10.63%+14.73% | +52.57%n/a | +29.91%n/a |
| Flows | IWP JMID | -$272K+$756K | -$126M-$2M | -$514M-$3M | +$1.21B-$4M | +$1.86B- | +$526M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWP JMID | +18.17%+16.69% | +23.55%+22.74% | +19.25%n/a | +22.38%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWP JMID | -8.45%-5.08% | -16.33%-16.29% | -25.34%n/a | -38.70%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWP JMID | 65d55d | 38d46d | 134dn/a | 1059dn/a |
IWP | JMID | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 2:55 PM | $129.97 | $28.32 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $129.88 | $28.94 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWP | JMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWP | JMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $129.97 | $28.32 |
| 1D performance | +0.07% | -2.13% |
| AuM | $18.99 B | $17.36 M |
| E/R | 0.23% | 0.3% |
IWP | JMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Janus Henderson Investors |
| Benchmark | Russell Midcap Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 245 | 82 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 17, 2001 | September 17, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWP and JMID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWP is down -5.09% year-to-date (YTD), while JMID has lost -0.42%. That puts JMID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWP or JMID?
Year-to-date, the IWP ETF saw -$514M in flows, compared to -$3M for JMID.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWP or JMID?
Over the past year, IWP had a volatility of 23.55%, while JMID experienced 22.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWP or JMID?
As of March 12, 2026, IWP holds $18.99 B in assets under management (AUM), while JMID manages $17.36 M.
What sectors do the IWP and JMID ETFs invest in?
IWP leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, JMID focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the IWP ETF and JMID ETF?
IWP top holdings include ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP, HOWMET AEROSPACE INC and VERTIV HOLDINGS. JMID holds in its top three: AMERISOURCEBERGEN, VERTIV HOLDINGS and AMERIPRISE FINANCE.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWP or JMID?
IWP holds 281 securities with 29.64% of its assets in the top 15. JMID has 83 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.53%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
