Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWPvsGLRYETF Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. IWP's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, GLRY's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. IWP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.23%, versus 0.96% for GLRY. IWP is down -5.09% year-to-date (YTD) with -$514M in YTD flows. GLRY performs better with 6.86% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWP and GLRY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWP vs GLRY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWP GLRY | -2.21%-2.51% | -6.57%+2.47% | -5.09%+6.86% | +10.63%+34.21% | +52.57%+67.81% | +29.91%+32.87% |
| Flows | IWP GLRY | -$272K+$3M | -$126M+$20M | -$514M+$19M | +$1.21B+$47M | +$1.86B+$57M | +$526M+$76M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWP GLRY | +18.17%+21.98% | +23.55%+21.32% | +19.25%+17.52% | +22.38%+20.32% |
| Max drawdown | IWP GLRY | -8.45%-6.18% | -16.33%-12.46% | -25.34%-20.66% | -38.70%-34.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWP GLRY | 65d14d | 38d37d | 134d209d | 1059d917d |
IWP | GLRY | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $129.88 | $37.65 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $132.99 | $38.15 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWP | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWP | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $129.88 | $37.65 |
| 1D performance | -2.34% | -1.31% |
| AuM | $18.99 B | $143.98 M |
| E/R | 0.23% | 0.96% |
IWP | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | Russell Midcap Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 245 | 32 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 17, 2001 | August 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWP and GLRY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWP is down -5.09% year-to-date (YTD), while GLRY has returned 6.86%. That puts GLRY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWP or GLRY?
Year-to-date, the IWP ETF saw -$514M in flows, compared to +$19M for GLRY.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWP or GLRY?
Over the past year, IWP had a volatility of 23.55%, while GLRY experienced 21.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWP or GLRY?
As of March 12, 2026, IWP holds $18.99 B in assets under management (AUM), while GLRY manages $143.98 M.
What sectors do the IWP and GLRY ETFs invest in?
IWP leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, GLRY focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWP ETF and GLRY ETF?
IWP top holdings include ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP, HOWMET AEROSPACE INC and VERTIV HOLDINGS. GLRY holds in its top three: AMPHENOL, KLA CORPORATION and CURTISS WRIGHT.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWP or GLRY?
IWP holds 281 securities with 29.64% of its assets in the top 15. GLRY has 32 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.93%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
