Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWPvsGFLWETF Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. IWP's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, GFLW's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials. IWP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.23%, versus 0.5% for GFLW. IWP is down -5.09% year-to-date (YTD) with -$514M in YTD flows. GFLW performs better with -5.01% YTD performance, and +$47M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWP and GFLW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWP vs GFLW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWP GFLW | -2.21%-0.93% | -6.57%-5.31% | -5.09%-5.01% | +10.63%+21.79% | +52.57%n/a | +29.91%n/a |
| Flows | IWP GFLW | -$272K+$42M | -$126M+$49M | -$514M+$47M | +$1.21B+$298M | +$1.86B- | +$526M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWP GFLW | +18.17%+19.15% | +23.55%+24.45% | +19.25%n/a | +22.38%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWP GFLW | -8.45%-8.23% | -16.33%-15.76% | -25.34%n/a | -38.70%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWP GFLW | 65d64d | 38d37d | 134dn/a | 1059dn/a |
IWP | GFLW | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $129.88 | $26.76 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $132.99 | $27.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWP | GFLW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWP | GFLW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $129.88 | $26.76 |
| 1D performance | -2.34% | -2.06% |
| AuM | $18.99 B | $653.11 M |
| E/R | 0.23% | 0.5% |
IWP | GFLW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | VictoryShares |
| Benchmark | Russell Midcap Growth Index | Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 245 | 89 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 17, 2001 | December 4, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWP and GFLW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWP is down -5.09% year-to-date (YTD), while GFLW has lost -5.01%. That puts GFLW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWP or GFLW?
Year-to-date, the IWP ETF saw -$514M in flows, compared to +$47M for GFLW.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWP or GFLW?
Over the past year, IWP had a volatility of 23.55%, while GFLW experienced 24.45%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWP or GFLW?
As of March 12, 2026, IWP holds $18.99 B in assets under management (AUM), while GFLW manages $653.11 M.
What sectors do the IWP and GFLW ETFs invest in?
IWP leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, GFLW focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the IWP ETF and GFLW ETF?
IWP top holdings include ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP, HOWMET AEROSPACE INC and VERTIV HOLDINGS. GFLW holds in its top three: US5128073062, KLA CORPORATION and NVIDIA.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWP or GFLW?
IWP holds 281 securities with 29.64% of its assets in the top 15. GFLW has 91 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.28%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
