IWPvsGFLWETF Comparison
VS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. IWP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.23%, versus 0.5% for GFLW. IWP is up 0.99% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1.30B in YTD flows. GFLW performs better with 18.23% YTD performance, and +$294M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWP and GFLW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IWP vs GFLW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWP GFLW | -4.69%-1.98% | -1.80%+3.43% | +0.99%+18.23% | -4.63%+17.05% | +46.66%n/a | +21.32%n/a |
| Flows | IWP GFLW | -$506M+$92M | -$585M+$224M | -$1.30B+$294M | -$562M+$363M | +$800M- | +$419M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWP GFLW | +18.32%+22.09% | +18.21%+22.00% | +19.86%n/a | +22.67%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWP GFLW | -8.32%-9.33% | -14.82%-14.90% | -25.34%n/a | -38.70%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWP GFLW | 43d42d | 245d172d | 134dn/a | 1059dn/a |
Trading data
IWP | GFLW | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $138.00 | $33.21 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $136.68 | $32.81 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IWP | GFLW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IWP | GFLW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $138.00 | $33.21 |
| 1D performance | +0.97% | +1.22% |
| AuM | $19.37 B | $1.05 B |
| E/R | 0.23% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
IWP | GFLW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | VictoryShares |
| Benchmark | Russell Midcap Growth Index | Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 265 | 100 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 17, 2001 | December 4, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IWP
USA
96.99%
Other
3.01%
GFLW
USA
96.35%
Other
3.65%
Sectors
IWP
Technology
32.07%
Industrials
17.59%
Healthcare
13.47%
Consumer Services
10.45%
Finance
8.54%
Other
17.87%
GFLW
Technology
43.92%
Industrials
16.36%
Healthcare
15.56%
Consumer Services
11.49%
Other
12.67%
Advertisement
Diversification
IWP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.24%
GFLW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.34%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
IWP
Snowflake, Inc.
2.91%
Cloudflare, Inc.
2.61%
Datadog, Inc.
2.57%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
2.15%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
1.73%
Cencora, Inc.
1.70%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.67%
Targa Resources Corp.
1.66%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
1.61%
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
1.48%
Vistra Corp.
1.46%
Autodesk, Inc.
1.45%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
1.44%
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
1.43%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.38%
GFLW
NVIDIA Corp.
3.76%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.13%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
2.82%
Sandisk Corp.
2.46%
Broadcom Inc.
2.45%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.37%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.33%
Lam Research Corp.
2.26%
GE Vernova, Inc.
2.19%
Royalty Pharma Plc
2.10%
Newmont Corp.
2.01%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
1.77%
Adobe, Inc.
1.58%
KLA Corp.
1.58%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
1.53%
Frequently asked questions about IWP and GFLW
How have the IWP and GFLW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, IWP is up 0.99% year-to-date (YTD), while GFLW has returned 18.23%. That puts GFLW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWP or GFLW?
Year-to-date, the IWP ETF saw -$1.30B in flows, compared to +$294M for GFLW.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWP or GFLW?
Over the past year, IWP had a volatility of 18.21%, while GFLW experienced 22%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWP or GFLW?
As of September 11, 2026, IWP holds $19.37 B in assets under management (AUM), while GFLW manages $1.05 B.
What sectors do the IWP and GFLW ETFs invest in?
IWP leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, GFLW focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the IWP ETF and GFLW ETF?
IWP top holdings include Snowflake, Inc., Cloudflare, Inc. and Datadog, Inc.. GFLW holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Caterpillar, Inc. and Dell Technologies, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IWP or GFLW?
IWP holds 267 securities with 27.24% of its assets in the top 15. GFLW has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.34%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
