IWOvsJSMLETF Comparison
VS
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap Growth. IWO's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Technology and Industrials. In contrast, JSML's top sector exposures are Healthcare, Technology and Finance. IWO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.24%, versus 0.3% for JSML. IWO is up 10.51% year-to-date (YTD) with -$393M in YTD flows. JSML performs better with 20.09% YTD performance, and +$62M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWO and JSML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IWO vs JSML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWO JSML | -0.50%+1.87% | -4.09%+0.67% | +10.51%+20.09% | +7.83%+16.04% | +77.24%+89.50% | +20.01%+36.65% |
| Flows | IWO JSML | -$58M+$26M | +$391M+$9M | -$393M+$62M | -$173M+$77M | -$473M+$109M | -$72M+$152M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWO JSML | +18.65%+17.44% | +21.95%+21.53% | +22.93%+21.99% | +24.66%+24.28% |
| Max drawdown | IWO JSML | -14.22%-9.13% | -14.82%-14.79% | -28.47%-25.88% | -40.45%-37.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWO JSML | 73d73d | 84d84d | 280d287d | 1409d1093d |
Trading data
IWO | JSML | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $359.77 | $89.41 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $356.22 | $88.17 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
JSML
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIWO | JSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IWO | JSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $359.77 | $89.41 |
| 1D performance | +1.00% | +1.40% |
| AuM | $14.13 B | $372.92 M |
| E/R | 0.24% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
IWO | JSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Janus Henderson Investors |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1092 | 120 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 24, 2000 | February 23, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IWO
USA
96.25%
Other
3.75%
JSML
USA
97.27%
Other
2.73%
Sectors
IWO
Healthcare
29.75%
Technology
17.87%
Industrials
13.23%
Finance
13.15%
Other
26%
JSML
Healthcare
27.96%
Technology
20.66%
Finance
15.45%
Industrials
7.89%
Consumer Services
7.22%
Other
20.82%
Advertisement
Diversification
IWO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.77%
JSML
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.49%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
IWO
JFrog Ltd.
0.69%
Moog, Inc.
0.67%
Glaukos Corp.
0.65%
Brinker International, Inc.
0.63%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.60%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.59%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
0.57%
Twist Bioscience Corp.
0.57%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.56%
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.56%
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
0.55%
InterDigital, Inc.
0.55%
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
0.54%
HealthEquity, Inc.
0.52%
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
0.50%
JSML
TriNet Group, Inc.
2.32%
Cactus, Inc.
2.26%
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
2.00%
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
1.93%
StepStone Group, Inc.
1.82%
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
1.78%
EnerSys
1.70%
Commvault Systems, Inc.
1.68%
MeiraGTx Holdings Plc
1.64%
Brinker International, Inc.
1.56%
Qualys, Inc.
1.55%
Griffon Corp.
1.34%
Haemonetics Corp.
1.33%
PagerDuty, Inc.
1.30%
CTS Corp.
1.30%
Frequently asked questions about IWO and JSML
How have the IWO and JSML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 28, 2026, IWO is up 10.51% year-to-date (YTD), while JSML has returned 20.09%. That puts JSML better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWO or JSML?
Year-to-date, the IWO ETF saw -$393M in flows, compared to +$62M for JSML.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWO or JSML?
Over the past year, IWO had a volatility of 21.95%, while JSML experienced 21.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWO or JSML?
As of October 28, 2026, IWO holds $14.13 B in assets under management (AUM), while JSML manages $372.92 M.
What sectors do the IWO and JSML ETFs invest in?
IWO leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, JSML focuses on Healthcare, Technology and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the IWO ETF and JSML ETF?
IWO top holdings include JFrog Ltd., Moog, Inc. and Glaukos Corp.. JSML holds in its top three: TriNet Group, Inc., Cactus, Inc. and Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IWO or JSML?
IWO holds 1100 securities with 8.77% of its assets in the top 15. JSML has 120 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.49%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
