Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWOvsIJTETF Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap Growth. IWO's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, IJT's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. IWO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.24%, versus 0.18% for IJT. IWO is down -2.1% year-to-date (YTD) with -$648M in YTD flows. IJT performs better with 1.19% YTD performance, and +$47M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWO and IJT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWO vs IJT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWO IJT | -4.45%-5.24% | -4.66%-1.83% | -2.10%+1.19% | +22.80%+16.92% | +48.61%+38.82% | +3.15%+11.85% |
| Flows | IWO IJT | -$134M+$61M | -$585M+$53M | -$648M+$47M | -$808M-$267M | -$696M-$53M | -$537M-$403M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWO IJT | +21.35%+17.03% | +25.14%+22.26% | +22.19%+20.11% | +24.58%+21.68% |
| Max drawdown | IWO IJT | -10.53%-7.29% | -17.18%-15.20% | -28.47%-27.37% | -40.45%-29.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWO IJT | 49d14d | 46d46d | 280d414d | 1409d980d |
IWO | IJT | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:31 PM | $319.85 | $144.53 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $324.87 | $146.11 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWO | IJT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWO | IJT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $319.85 | $144.53 |
| 1D performance | -1.55% | -1.08% |
| AuM | $12.36 B | $6.40 B |
| E/R | 0.24% | 0.18% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWO and IJT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWO is down -2.1% year-to-date (YTD), while IJT has returned 1.19%. That puts IJT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWO or IJT?
Year-to-date, the IWO ETF saw -$648M in flows, compared to +$47M for IJT.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWO or IJT?
Over the past year, IWO had a volatility of 25.14%, while IJT experienced 22.26%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWO or IJT?
As of March 12, 2026, IWO holds $12.36 B in assets under management (AUM), while IJT manages $6.40 B.
What sectors do the IWO and IJT ETFs invest in?
IWO leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, IJT focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the IWO ETF and IJT ETF?
IWO top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS. IJT holds in its top three: ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, ARROWHEAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC and INTERDIGITAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWO or IJT?
IWO holds 1094 securities with 13.7% of its assets in the top 15. IJT has 336 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.08%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
