IWMWvsSCDSETF Comparison
VS
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) is part of the US Small Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Healthcare and Technology. IWMW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.4% for SCDS. IWMW is up 12.52% year-to-date (YTD) with +$24M in YTD flows. SCDS performs better with 21.84% YTD performance, and +$752K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMW and SCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IWMW vs SCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMW SCDS | -4.35%-6.45% | +1.98%-3.25% | +12.52%+21.84% | +15.10%+25.05% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | IWMW SCDS | -$821K+$759K | +$7M+$757K | +$24M+$752K | +$31M+$757K | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMW SCDS | +9.88%+13.21% | +12.37%+17.61% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IWMW SCDS | -4.38%-6.56% | -6.92%-8.90% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMW SCDS | 30d30d | 62d78d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
IWMW | SCDS | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 7:54 PM | $38.14 | $72.51 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $38.25 | $72.83 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIWMW | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 7:54 PM
Live
Closed
IWMW | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.14 | $72.51 |
| 1D performance | -0.29% | -0.44% |
| AuM | $57.47 M | $9.48 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
IWMW | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Cboe FTSE Russell IWM 2% OTM BuyWrite Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1945 | 270 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 14, 2024 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IWMW
USA
96.06%
Other
3.94%
SCDS
USA
94.75%
Other
5.25%
Sectors
IWMW
Finance
26.88%
Healthcare
20.29%
Technology
11.87%
Industrials
10.58%
Other
30.37%
SCDS
Finance
26.53%
Healthcare
17.81%
Technology
13.96%
Industrials
10.55%
Other
31.16%
Advertisement
Diversification
IWMW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.1%
SCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.4%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
IWMW
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.61%
Moog, Inc.
0.39%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.38%
Hut 8 Corp.
0.36%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.35%
Cytokinetics, Inc.
0.34%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.32%
Glaukos Corp.
0.31%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.31%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.30%
Old National Bancorp
0.30%
Brinker International, Inc.
0.29%
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.28%
HealthEquity, Inc.
0.28%
JFrog Ltd.
0.28%
SCDS
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
1.13%
Moog, Inc.
1.04%
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
0.98%
WSFS Financial Corp.
0.97%
AZZ, Inc.
0.95%
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
0.95%
Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
0.90%
Enova International, Inc.
0.86%
Knowles Corp.
0.85%
MYR Group, Inc.
0.82%
Kite Realty Group Trust
0.82%
First Financial Bancorp (Ohio)
0.80%
Perimeter Solutions, Inc.
0.78%
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
0.78%
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
0.77%
Frequently asked questions about IWMW and SCDS
How have the IWMW and SCDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, IWMW is up 12.52% year-to-date (YTD), while SCDS has returned 21.84%. That puts SCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMW or SCDS?
Year-to-date, the IWMW ETF saw +$24M in flows, compared to +$752K for SCDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMW or SCDS?
Over the past year, IWMW had a volatility of 12.37%, while SCDS experienced 17.61%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMW or SCDS?
As of September 15, 2026, IWMW holds $57.47 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCDS manages $9.48 M.
What sectors do the IWMW and SCDS ETFs invest in?
IWMW leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, SCDS focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IWMW ETF and SCDS ETF?
IWMW top holdings include BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury, Moog, Inc. and BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.. SCDS holds in its top three: Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc., Moog, Inc. and The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMW or SCDS?
IWMW holds 1957 securities with 5.1% of its assets in the top 15. SCDS has 270 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.4%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
