Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWMWvsRYLGETF Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. IWMW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, RYLG's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. IWMW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.35% for RYLG. IWMW is down -0.85% year-to-date (YTD) with +$13M in YTD flows. RYLG performs better with 0.21% YTD performance, and -$234K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMW and RYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWMW vs RYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMW RYLG | -2.68%-3.47% | -0.98%-0.90% | -0.85%+0.21% | +13.46%+17.85% | n/a+34.44% | n/an/a |
| Flows | IWMW RYLG | +$4M- | +$17M-$234K | +$13M-$234K | +$27M+$208K | -+$5M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMW RYLG | +13.57%+15.24% | +17.61%+19.70% | n/a+16.93% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IWMW RYLG | -5.49%-5.97% | -14.60%-15.02% | n/a-22.43% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMW RYLG | 14d14d | 98d74d | n/a296d | n/an/a |
IWMW | RYLG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.94 | $21.84 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $37.07 | $21.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWMW | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWMW | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.94 | $21.84 |
| 1D performance | -0.35% | -0.36% |
| AuM | $45.89 M | $7.67 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWMW and RYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMW is down -0.85% year-to-date (YTD), while RYLG has returned 0.21%. That puts RYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMW or RYLG?
Year-to-date, the IWMW ETF saw +$13M in flows, compared to -$234K for RYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMW or RYLG?
Over the past year, IWMW had a volatility of 17.61%, while RYLG experienced 19.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMW or RYLG?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMW holds $45.89 M in assets under management (AUM), while RYLG manages $7.67 M.
What sectors do the IWMW and RYLG ETFs invest in?
IWMW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, RYLG focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWMW ETF and RYLG ETF?
IWMW top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS. RYLG holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMW or RYLG?
IWMW holds 1942 securities with 8.07% of its assets in the top 15. RYLG has 1883 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.8%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
