Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWMWvsIWMIETF Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. IWMW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, IWMI's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. IWMW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.78% for IWMI. IWMW is down -0.85% year-to-date (YTD) with +$13M in YTD flows. IWMI performs better with 0.28% YTD performance, and +$214M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMW and IWMI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWMW vs IWMI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMW IWMI | -2.68%-3.64% | -0.98%-1.36% | -0.85%+0.28% | +13.46%+23.95% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | IWMW IWMI | +$4M+$59M | +$17M+$259M | +$13M+$214M | +$27M+$488M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMW IWMI | +13.57%+14.04% | +17.61%+19.09% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IWMW IWMI | -5.49%-5.83% | -14.60%-15.22% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMW IWMI | 14d14d | 98d52d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
IWMW | IWMI | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 7:59 PM | $37.07 | $47.65 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $37.80 | $47.68 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWMW | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWMW | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.07 | $47.65 |
| 1D performance | -1.94% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $45.89 M | $645.76 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.78% |
IWMW | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Cboe FTSE Russell IWM 2% OTM BuyWrite Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1635 | 1636 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 14, 2024 | June 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWMW and IWMI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMW is down -0.85% year-to-date (YTD), while IWMI has returned 0.28%. That puts IWMI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMW or IWMI?
Year-to-date, the IWMW ETF saw +$13M in flows, compared to +$214M for IWMI.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMW or IWMI?
Over the past year, IWMW had a volatility of 17.61%, while IWMI experienced 19.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMW or IWMI?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMW holds $45.89 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWMI manages $645.76 M.
What sectors do the IWMW and IWMI ETFs invest in?
IWMW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, IWMI focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWMW ETF and IWMI ETF?
IWMW top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS. IWMI holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMW or IWMI?
IWMW holds 1942 securities with 8.07% of its assets in the top 15. IWMI has 1958 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.56%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
