Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWMWvsFSCCETF Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) is part of the US Small Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Financials and Health Care. IWMW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.51% for FSCC. IWMW is down -1.16% year-to-date (YTD) with +$13M in YTD flows. FSCC performs better with 0.54% YTD performance, and +$85M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMW and FSCC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWMW vs FSCC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMW FSCC | -4.09%-5.46% | -1.22%-2.90% | -1.16%+0.54% | +14.82%+28.16% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | IWMW FSCC | +$4M+$15M | +$15M+$96M | +$13M+$85M | +$27M+$143M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMW FSCC | +13.59%+17.34% | +17.54%+23.19% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IWMW FSCC | -5.78%-6.47% | -14.60%-16.39% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMW FSCC | 15d48d | 98d46d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
IWMW | FSCC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.94 | $29.51 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $37.07 | $29.58 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWMW | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWMW | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.94 | $29.51 |
| 1D performance | -0.35% | -0.24% |
| AuM | $45.75 M | $156.42 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.51% |
IWMW | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Federated Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Cboe FTSE Russell IWM 2% OTM BuyWrite Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1635 | 272 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 14, 2024 | July 31, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWMW and FSCC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, IWMW is down -1.16% year-to-date (YTD), while FSCC has returned 0.54%. That puts FSCC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMW or FSCC?
Year-to-date, the IWMW ETF saw +$13M in flows, compared to +$85M for FSCC.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMW or FSCC?
Over the past year, IWMW had a volatility of 17.54%, while FSCC experienced 23.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMW or FSCC?
As of March 13, 2026, IWMW holds $45.75 M in assets under management (AUM), while FSCC manages $156.42 M.
What sectors do the IWMW and FSCC ETFs invest in?
IWMW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, FSCC focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the IWMW ETF and FSCC ETF?
IWMW top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS. FSCC holds in its top three: PRIMORIS SERVICES, MIRUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC and JACKSON FINANCIAL INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMW or FSCC?
IWMW holds 1942 securities with 8.07% of its assets in the top 15. FSCC has 276 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.58%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
