Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWMIvsVTWOETF Comparison
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) is part of the US Small Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Health Care and Financials. IWMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.78%, versus 0.06% for VTWO. IWMI is up 0.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$214M in YTD flows. VTWO performs better with 0.48% YTD performance, and +$71M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMI and VTWO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWMI vs VTWO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMI VTWO | -3.64%-4.73% | -1.36%-2.16% | +0.28%+0.48% | +23.95%+24.55% | n/a+49.09% | n/a+13.38% |
| Flows | IWMI VTWO | +$59M+$470M | +$259M+$196M | +$214M+$71M | +$488M+$536M | -+$4.85B | -+$7.21B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMI VTWO | +14.04%+18.44% | +19.09%+23.16% | n/a+21.10% | n/a+22.69% |
| Max drawdown | IWMI VTWO | -5.83%-8.30% | -15.22%-16.46% | n/a-27.51% | n/a-31.93% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMI VTWO | 14d49d | 52d52d | n/a289d | n/a1093d |
IWMI | VTWO | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.49 | $99.65 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $47.68 | $100.03 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWMI | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWMI | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.49 | $99.65 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | -0.38% |
| AuM | $645.76 M | $13.93 B |
| E/R | 0.78% | 0.06% |
IWMI | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 2000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 1636 | 1636 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 25, 2024 | September 20, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWMI and VTWO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMI is up 0.28% year-to-date (YTD), while VTWO has returned 0.48%. That puts VTWO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMI or VTWO?
Year-to-date, the IWMI ETF saw +$214M in flows, compared to +$71M for VTWO.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMI or VTWO?
Over the past year, IWMI had a volatility of 19.09%, while VTWO experienced 23.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMI or VTWO?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMI holds $645.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while VTWO manages $13.93 B.
What sectors do the IWMI and VTWO ETFs invest in?
IWMI leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, VTWO focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWMI ETF and VTWO ETF?
IWMI top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET. VTWO holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMI or VTWO?
IWMI holds 1958 securities with 7.56% of its assets in the top 15. VTWO has 1958 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.4%.
Will 2024 be the Year of Small Caps and Value Stocks?
Value ETFs Shine Amid Lower-Than-Expected Inflation
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
