IWMIvsRYLGETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
RYLG
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
+0.07%
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Health Care and Financials. IWMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.78%, versus 0.35% for RYLG. IWMI is up 10.25% year-to-date (YTD) with +$335M in YTD flows. RYLG performs worse with 9.19% YTD performance, and -$461K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMI and RYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IWMI vs RYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 05/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMI RYLG | +8.72%+7.90% | +5.17%+4.56% | +10.25%+9.19% | +38.01%+31.21% | n/a+43.21% | n/an/a |
| Flows | IWMI RYLG | +$96M-$226K | +$237M-$226K | +$335M-$461K | +$596M+$147K | -+$5M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMI RYLG | +18.33%+17.47% | +14.88%+14.93% | n/a+16.90% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IWMI RYLG | -8.39%-7.99% | -8.39%-7.99% | n/a-22.43% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMI RYLG | 46d49d | 46d49d | n/a296d | n/an/a |
Trading data
IWMI | RYLG | |
Last sale 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.23 | $23.50 |
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | $51.02 | $23.45 |
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IWMI
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIWMI | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IWMI | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.23 | $23.50 |
| 1D performance | +0.41% | +0.19% |
| AuM | $817.91 M | $8.00 M |
| E/R | 0.78% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
IWMI | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 1612 | 1606 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 25, 2024 | October 4, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IWMI
USA
89.36%
Other
10.64%
RYLG
USA
91.69%
Other
8.31%
Sectors
IWMI
Industrials
14.97%
Health Care
14.66%
Financials
14.06%
Information Techn.
13.7%
Consumer Discreti.
8.17%
Other
34.43%
RYLG
Industrials
15.39%
Health Care
14.99%
Financials
14.88%
Information Techn.
13.99%
Consumer Discreti.
8.49%
Other
32.26%
Advertisement
Diversification
IWMI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.3%
RYLG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.26%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
IWMI
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
0.98%
COEUR MINING INC
0.63%
FABRINET
0.62%
US65290E1010
0.58%
ECHOSTAR
0.52%
CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING
0.50%
KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS
0.42%
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES
0.40%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
0.40%
HECLA MINING
0.39%
BRIDGEBIO PHARMA
0.39%
GUARDANT HEALTH INC
0.38%
MODINE MNFC CO
0.38%
ENSIGN GROUP
0.37%
TTM TECHNOLOGIES
0.33%
RYLG
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
0.93%
FABRINET
0.63%
COEUR MINING INC
0.59%
US65290E1010
0.58%
ECHOSTAR
0.54%
CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING
0.50%
KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS
0.42%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
0.40%
ENSIGN GROUP
0.40%
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES
0.40%
BRIDGEBIO PHARMA
0.39%
HECLA MINING
0.39%
GUARDANT HEALTH INC
0.38%
MODINE MNFC CO
0.38%
DYCOM INDUSTRIES
0.34%
Frequently asked questions about IWMI and RYLG
How have the IWMI and RYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of May 1, 2026, IWMI is up 10.25% year-to-date (YTD), while RYLG has returned 9.19%. That puts IWMI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMI or RYLG?
Year-to-date, the IWMI ETF saw +$335M in flows, compared to -$461K for RYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMI or RYLG?
Over the past year, IWMI had a volatility of 14.88%, while RYLG experienced 14.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMI or RYLG?
As of May 1, 2026, IWMI holds $817.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while RYLG manages $8.00 M.
What sectors do the IWMI and RYLG ETFs invest in?
IWMI leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, RYLG focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWMI ETF and RYLG ETF?
IWMI top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, COEUR MINING INC and FABRINET. RYLG holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, FABRINET and COEUR MINING INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMI or RYLG?
IWMI holds 1948 securities with 7.3% of its assets in the top 15. RYLG has 1856 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.26%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
