IWMIvsRYLGETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
RYLG
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
+0.69%
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. IWMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.78%, versus 0.35% for RYLG. IWMI is up 16.29% year-to-date (YTD) with +$467M in YTD flows. RYLG performs worse with 14.35% YTD performance, and -$461K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMI and RYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IWMI vs RYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMI RYLG | +6.19%+5.30% | +16.19%+14.20% | +16.29%+14.35% | +37.06%+30.69% | n/a+44.61% | n/an/a |
| Flows | IWMI RYLG | +$97M- | +$244M-$226K | +$467M-$461K | +$709M-$458K | -+$4M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMI RYLG | +17.99%+14.90% | +15.37%+14.78% | n/a+16.81% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IWMI RYLG | -4.64%-3.25% | -8.39%-7.99% | n/a-22.43% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMI RYLG | 8d7d | 46d49d | n/a296d | n/an/a |
Trading data
IWMI | RYLG | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $52.74 | $24.53 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $51.85 | $24.23 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IWMI
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIWMI | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IWMI | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $52.74 | $24.53 |
| 1D performance | +1.72% | +1.25% |
| AuM | $977.29 M | $8.32 M |
| E/R | 0.78% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
IWMI | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 1598 | 1593 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 25, 2024 | October 4, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IWMI
USA
92.72%
Other
7.28%
RYLG
USA
90.93%
Other
9.07%
Sectors
IWMI
Industrials
16.51%
Information Techn.
16.22%
Financials
14.11%
Health Care
13.81%
Consumer Discreti.
8.21%
Other
31.14%
RYLG
Industrials
16.21%
Information Techn.
15.81%
Financials
14.21%
Health Care
13.63%
Consumer Discreti.
8.11%
Other
32.04%
Advertisement
Diversification
IWMI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.89%
RYLG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.7%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
IWMI
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
1.90%
CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING
0.86%
FABRINET
0.76%
COEUR MINING INC
0.56%
US65290E1010
0.53%
ECHOSTAR
0.51%
TTM TECHNOLOGIES
0.50%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
0.47%
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES
0.44%
MODINE MNFC CO
0.41%
IONQ
0.41%
SITIME CORP
0.39%
RAMBUS
0.38%
DYCOM INDUSTRIES
0.37%
VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC
0.37%
RYLG
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
1.96%
CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING
0.88%
FABRINET
0.72%
COEUR MINING INC
0.55%
US65290E1010
0.52%
ECHOSTAR
0.50%
IONQ
0.45%
TTM TECHNOLOGIES
0.44%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
0.43%
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES
0.42%
MODINE MNFC CO
0.38%
RAMBUS
0.38%
SITIME CORP
0.37%
DYCOM INDUSTRIES
0.35%
BRIDGEBIO PHARMA
0.35%
Frequently asked questions about IWMI and RYLG
How have the IWMI and RYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, IWMI is up 16.29% year-to-date (YTD), while RYLG has returned 14.35%. That puts IWMI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMI or RYLG?
Year-to-date, the IWMI ETF saw +$467M in flows, compared to -$461K for RYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMI or RYLG?
Over the past year, IWMI had a volatility of 15.37%, while RYLG experienced 14.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMI or RYLG?
As of June 18, 2026, IWMI holds $977.29 M in assets under management (AUM), while RYLG manages $8.32 M.
What sectors do the IWMI and RYLG ETFs invest in?
IWMI leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, RYLG focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWMI ETF and RYLG ETF?
IWMI top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET. RYLG holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMI or RYLG?
IWMI holds 1945 securities with 8.89% of its assets in the top 15. RYLG has 1890 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.7%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
