Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWMIvsRYLGETF Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Health Care and Financials. IWMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.78%, versus 0.35% for RYLG. IWMI is up 0.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$214M in YTD flows. RYLG performs worse with 0.21% YTD performance, and -$234K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMI and RYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWMI vs RYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMI RYLG | -3.64%-3.47% | -1.36%-0.90% | +0.28%+0.21% | +23.95%+17.85% | n/a+34.44% | n/an/a |
| Flows | IWMI RYLG | +$59M- | +$259M-$234K | +$214M-$234K | +$488M+$208K | -+$5M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMI RYLG | +14.04%+15.24% | +19.09%+19.70% | n/a+16.93% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IWMI RYLG | -5.83%-5.97% | -15.22%-15.02% | n/a-22.43% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMI RYLG | 14d14d | 52d74d | n/a296d | n/an/a |
IWMI | RYLG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 5:20 PM | $47.53 | $21.92 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $47.68 | $22.38 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWMI | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWMI | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.53 | $21.92 |
| 1D performance | -0.31% | -2.06% |
| AuM | $645.76 M | $7.67 M |
| E/R | 0.78% | 0.35% |
IWMI | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 1636 | 1631 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 25, 2024 | October 4, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWMI and RYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMI is up 0.28% year-to-date (YTD), while RYLG has returned 0.21%. That puts IWMI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMI or RYLG?
Year-to-date, the IWMI ETF saw +$214M in flows, compared to -$234K for RYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMI or RYLG?
Over the past year, IWMI had a volatility of 19.09%, while RYLG experienced 19.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMI or RYLG?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMI holds $645.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while RYLG manages $7.67 M.
What sectors do the IWMI and RYLG ETFs invest in?
IWMI leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, RYLG focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWMI ETF and RYLG ETF?
IWMI top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET. RYLG holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMI or RYLG?
IWMI holds 1958 securities with 7.56% of its assets in the top 15. RYLG has 1883 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.8%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
