Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWMIvsRSSLETF Comparison
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) is part of the US Small Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Health Care and Financials. IWMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.78%, versus 0.08% for RSSL. IWMI is up 0.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$214M in YTD flows. RSSL performs better with 0.46% YTD performance, and -$28M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMI and RSSL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWMI vs RSSL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMI RSSL | -3.64%-4.73% | -1.36%-2.18% | +0.28%+0.46% | +23.95%+24.40% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | IWMI RSSL | +$59M+$8M | +$259M-$78M | +$214M-$28M | +$488M-$381M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMI RSSL | +14.04%+18.43% | +19.09%+23.16% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IWMI RSSL | -5.83%-8.31% | -15.22%-16.46% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMI RSSL | 14d49d | 52d52d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
IWMI | RSSL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.49 | $96.57 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $47.68 | $96.89 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWMI | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWMI | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.49 | $96.57 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | -0.33% |
| AuM | $645.76 M | $1.33 B |
| E/R | 0.78% | 0.08% |
IWMI | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 1636 | 1631 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 25, 2024 | June 4, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWMI and RSSL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMI is up 0.28% year-to-date (YTD), while RSSL has returned 0.46%. That puts RSSL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMI or RSSL?
Year-to-date, the IWMI ETF saw +$214M in flows, compared to -$28M for RSSL.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMI or RSSL?
Over the past year, IWMI had a volatility of 19.09%, while RSSL experienced 23.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMI or RSSL?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMI holds $645.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while RSSL manages $1.33 B.
What sectors do the IWMI and RSSL ETFs invest in?
IWMI leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, RSSL focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWMI ETF and RSSL ETF?
IWMI top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET. RSSL holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMI or RSSL?
IWMI holds 1958 securities with 7.56% of its assets in the top 15. RSSL has 1883 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.74%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.