Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWMIvsIWMWETF Comparison
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. IWMI's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, IWMW's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. IWMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.78%, versus 0.39% for IWMW. IWMI is up 0.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$214M in YTD flows. IWMW performs worse with -0.85% YTD performance, and +$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMI and IWMW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWMI vs IWMW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMI IWMW | -3.64%-2.68% | -1.36%-0.98% | +0.28%-0.85% | +23.95%+13.46% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | IWMI IWMW | +$59M+$4M | +$259M+$17M | +$214M+$13M | +$488M+$27M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMI IWMW | +14.04%+13.57% | +19.09%+17.61% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IWMI IWMW | -5.83%-5.49% | -15.22%-14.60% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMI IWMW | 14d14d | 52d98d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
IWMI | IWMW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.49 | $36.94 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $47.68 | $37.07 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWMI | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWMI | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.49 | $36.94 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | -0.35% |
| AuM | $645.76 M | $45.89 M |
| E/R | 0.78% | 0.39% |
IWMI | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Cboe FTSE Russell IWM 2% OTM BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 1636 | 1635 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 25, 2024 | March 14, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWMI and IWMW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMI is up 0.28% year-to-date (YTD), while IWMW has lost -0.85%. That puts IWMI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMI or IWMW?
Year-to-date, the IWMI ETF saw +$214M in flows, compared to +$13M for IWMW.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMI or IWMW?
Over the past year, IWMI had a volatility of 19.09%, while IWMW experienced 17.61%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMI or IWMW?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMI holds $645.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWMW manages $45.89 M.
What sectors do the IWMI and IWMW ETFs invest in?
IWMI leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, IWMW focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the IWMI ETF and IWMW ETF?
IWMI top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET. IWMW holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMI or IWMW?
IWMI holds 1958 securities with 7.56% of its assets in the top 15. IWMW has 1942 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.07%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.