Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWMIvsGSSCETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. IWMI's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, GSSC's top sector exposures are Health Care, Financials and Industrials. IWMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.78%, versus 0.2% for GSSC. IWMI is down -0.04% year-to-date (YTD) with +$220M in YTD flows. GSSC performs better with 0.2% YTD performance, and +$134M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMI and GSSC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWMI vs GSSC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMI GSSC | -4.94%-5.20% | -1.16%-3.36% | -0.04%+0.20% | +25.31%+21.02% | n/a+46.32% | n/a+24.28% |
| Flows | IWMI GSSC | +$55M- | +$265M+$137M | +$220M+$134M | +$497M+$250M | -+$245M | -+$405M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMI GSSC | +14.01%+16.91% | +19.03%+22.32% | n/a+20.59% | n/a+21.59% |
| Max drawdown | IWMI GSSC | -6.14%-7.02% | -15.22%-15.00% | n/a-25.99% | n/a-27.32% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMI GSSC | 15d48d | 52d46d | n/a289d | n/a977d |
IWMI | GSSC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.49 | $73.99 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $47.68 | $74.24 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWMI | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWMI | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.49 | $73.99 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | -0.34% |
| AuM | $649.85 M | $855.44 M |
| E/R | 0.78% | 0.2% |
IWMI | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 1636 | 1210 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 25, 2024 | June 28, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWMI and GSSC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, IWMI is down -0.04% year-to-date (YTD), while GSSC has returned 0.2%. That puts GSSC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMI or GSSC?
Year-to-date, the IWMI ETF saw +$220M in flows, compared to +$134M for GSSC.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMI or GSSC?
Over the past year, IWMI had a volatility of 19.03%, while GSSC experienced 22.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMI or GSSC?
As of March 13, 2026, IWMI holds $649.85 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSSC manages $855.44 M.
What sectors do the IWMI and GSSC ETFs invest in?
IWMI leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, GSSC focuses on Health Care, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the IWMI ETF and GSSC ETF?
IWMI top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET. GSSC holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, IES HOLDINGS and COMPASS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMI or GSSC?
IWMI holds 1958 securities with 7.56% of its assets in the top 15. GSSC has 1322 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.25%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
