IWMIvsGSSCETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
GSSC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
+0.07%
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Health Care and Financials. IWMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.78%, versus 0.2% for GSSC. IWMI is up 10.25% year-to-date (YTD) with +$335M in YTD flows. GSSC performs worse with 8.01% YTD performance, and +$145M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMI and GSSC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IWMI vs GSSC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 05/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMI GSSC | +8.72%+12.38% | +5.17%+2.69% | +10.25%+8.01% | +38.01%+32.65% | n/a+56.43% | n/a+35.54% |
| Flows | IWMI GSSC | +$96M+$8M | +$237M+$133M | +$335M+$145M | +$596M+$255M | -+$270M | -+$375M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMI GSSC | +18.33%+20.45% | +14.88%+18.86% | n/a+20.62% | n/a+21.55% |
| Max drawdown | IWMI GSSC | -8.39%-9.76% | -8.39%-10.69% | n/a-25.99% | n/a-27.32% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMI GSSC | 46d63d | 46d84d | n/a289d | n/a977d |
Trading data
IWMI | GSSC | |
Last sale 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.23 | $83.64 |
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | $51.02 | $83.17 |
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IWMI
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIWMI | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IWMI | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.23 | $83.64 |
| 1D performance | +0.41% | +0.57% |
| AuM | $817.91 M | $931.80 M |
| E/R | 0.78% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
IWMI | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 1612 | 1191 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 25, 2024 | June 28, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IWMI
USA
89.36%
Other
10.64%
GSSC
USA
90.5%
Other
9.5%
Sectors
IWMI
Industrials
14.97%
Health Care
14.66%
Financials
14.06%
Information Techn.
13.7%
Consumer Discreti.
8.17%
Other
34.43%
GSSC
Industrials
16.57%
Health Care
16.11%
Financials
15.64%
Information Techn.
13.03%
Consumer Discreti.
10.49%
Other
28.17%
Advertisement
Diversification
IWMI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.3%
GSSC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.29%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
IWMI
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
0.98%
COEUR MINING INC
0.63%
FABRINET
0.62%
US65290E1010
0.58%
ECHOSTAR
0.52%
CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING
0.50%
KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS
0.42%
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES
0.40%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
0.40%
HECLA MINING
0.39%
BRIDGEBIO PHARMA
0.39%
GUARDANT HEALTH INC
0.38%
MODINE MNFC CO
0.38%
ENSIGN GROUP
0.37%
TTM TECHNOLOGIES
0.33%
GSSC
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
0.54%
IES HOLDINGS
0.45%
FABRINET
0.43%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
0.37%
CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING
0.35%
US65290E1010
0.34%
WTTS WTER TECH
0.34%
TTM TECHNOLOGIES
0.33%
ENSIGN GROUP
0.33%
ALKERMES
0.32%
PTC THERAPEUTI/D
0.31%
PRIMORIS SERVICES
0.31%
MODINE MNFC CO
0.30%
UNITED NATURAL FOODS
0.29%
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES
0.29%
Frequently asked questions about IWMI and GSSC
How have the IWMI and GSSC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of May 1, 2026, IWMI is up 10.25% year-to-date (YTD), while GSSC has returned 8.01%. That puts IWMI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMI or GSSC?
Year-to-date, the IWMI ETF saw +$335M in flows, compared to +$145M for GSSC.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMI or GSSC?
Over the past year, IWMI had a volatility of 14.88%, while GSSC experienced 18.86%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMI or GSSC?
As of May 1, 2026, IWMI holds $817.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSSC manages $931.80 M.
What sectors do the IWMI and GSSC ETFs invest in?
IWMI leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, GSSC focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWMI ETF and GSSC ETF?
IWMI top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, COEUR MINING INC and FABRINET. GSSC holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, IES HOLDINGS and FABRINET.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMI or GSSC?
IWMI holds 1948 securities with 7.3% of its assets in the top 15. GSSC has 1315 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.29%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
