Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWMIvsFSCCETF Comparison
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) is part of the US Small Cap segment. IWMI's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, FSCC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. IWMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.78%, versus 0.51% for FSCC. IWMI is up 0.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$214M in YTD flows. FSCC performs better with 0.54% YTD performance, and +$85M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMI and FSCC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWMI vs FSCC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMI FSCC | -3.64%-5.46% | -1.36%-2.90% | +0.28%+0.54% | +23.95%+28.16% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | IWMI FSCC | +$59M+$15M | +$259M+$96M | +$214M+$85M | +$488M+$143M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMI FSCC | +14.04%+17.34% | +19.09%+23.19% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IWMI FSCC | -5.83%-6.47% | -15.22%-16.39% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMI FSCC | 14d48d | 52d46d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
IWMI | FSCC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.49 | $29.51 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $47.68 | $29.58 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
IWMI | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.49 | $29.51 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | -0.24% |
| AuM | $645.76 M | $156.42 M |
| E/R | 0.78% | 0.51% |
IWMI | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | Federated Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 1636 | 272 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 25, 2024 | July 31, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWMI and FSCC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMI is up 0.28% year-to-date (YTD), while FSCC has returned 0.54%. That puts FSCC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMI or FSCC?
Year-to-date, the IWMI ETF saw +$214M in flows, compared to +$85M for FSCC.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMI or FSCC?
Over the past year, IWMI had a volatility of 19.09%, while FSCC experienced 23.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMI or FSCC?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMI holds $645.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while FSCC manages $156.42 M.
What sectors do the IWMI and FSCC ETFs invest in?
IWMI leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, FSCC focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the IWMI ETF and FSCC ETF?
IWMI top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET. FSCC holds in its top three: PRIMORIS SERVICES, MIRUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC and JACKSON FINANCIAL INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMI or FSCC?
IWMI holds 1958 securities with 7.56% of its assets in the top 15. FSCC has 276 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.58%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.