IWMIvsFSCCETF Comparison
VS
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) is part of the US Small Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. IWMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.78%, versus 0.51% for FSCC. IWMI is up 16.29% year-to-date (YTD) with +$467M in YTD flows. FSCC performs better with 17.19% YTD performance, and +$188M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMI and FSCC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IWMI vs FSCC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMI FSCC | +6.19%+5.05% | +16.19%+17.23% | +16.29%+17.19% | +37.06%+39.48% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | IWMI FSCC | +$97M+$59M | +$244M+$102M | +$467M+$188M | +$709M+$243M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMI FSCC | +17.99%+21.37% | +15.37%+19.39% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IWMI FSCC | -4.64%-5.01% | -8.39%-11.07% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMI FSCC | 8d8d | 46d83d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
IWMI | FSCC | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $52.74 | $35.86 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $51.85 | $35.18 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IWMI | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $52.74 | $35.86 |
| 1D performance | +1.72% | +1.94% |
| AuM | $977.29 M | $291.40 M |
| E/R | 0.78% | 0.51% |
Characteristics
IWMI | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | Federated Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 1598 | 267 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 25, 2024 | July 31, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IWMI
USA
92.72%
Other
7.28%
FSCC
USA
77.69%
Other
22.31%
Sectors
IWMI
Industrials
16.51%
Information Techn.
16.22%
Financials
14.11%
Health Care
13.81%
Consumer Discreti.
8.21%
Other
31.14%
FSCC
Industrials
16.85%
Information Techn.
15.34%
Financials
14.58%
Health Care
13.71%
Consumer Discreti.
7.19%
Other
32.33%
Advertisement
Diversification
IWMI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.89%
FSCC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.1%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
IWMI
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
1.90%
CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING
0.86%
FABRINET
0.76%
COEUR MINING INC
0.56%
US65290E1010
0.53%
ECHOSTAR
0.51%
TTM TECHNOLOGIES
0.50%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
0.47%
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES
0.44%
MODINE MNFC CO
0.41%
IONQ
0.41%
SITIME CORP
0.39%
RAMBUS
0.38%
DYCOM INDUSTRIES
0.37%
VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC
0.37%
FSCC
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
1.63%
PRIMORIS SERVICES
1.58%
POWELL INDUSTRIES
1.35%
MIRUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC
1.28%
JACKSON FINANCIAL INC
1.26%
BANKUNITED
1.18%
MADISON SQUARE GARDEN ENTERTAINMENT CORP
1.14%
SPS COMMERCE
1.09%
EMCOR GROUP
1.01%
MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS SER
0.99%
CNO FINANCIAL GROUP
0.97%
FB FINANCIAL
0.94%
POSTAL REALTY TRUST INC
0.91%
FLUOR
0.90%
TALOS ENERGY INC
0.87%
Frequently asked questions about IWMI and FSCC
How have the IWMI and FSCC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, IWMI is up 16.29% year-to-date (YTD), while FSCC has returned 17.19%. That puts FSCC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMI or FSCC?
Year-to-date, the IWMI ETF saw +$467M in flows, compared to +$188M for FSCC.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMI or FSCC?
Over the past year, IWMI had a volatility of 15.37%, while FSCC experienced 19.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMI or FSCC?
As of June 18, 2026, IWMI holds $977.29 M in assets under management (AUM), while FSCC manages $291.40 M.
What sectors do the IWMI and FSCC ETFs invest in?
IWMI leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, FSCC focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWMI ETF and FSCC ETF?
IWMI top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET. FSCC holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, PRIMORIS SERVICES and POWELL INDUSTRIES.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMI or FSCC?
IWMI holds 1945 securities with 8.89% of its assets in the top 15. FSCC has 269 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.1%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
